Bro, please read your question(s). You say you don't disregard the views about young people cycling or should I say not cycling, given here, then in the next breath, you support younger users. That somehow the results over ride the possible side effects, ones that may not come up until you're older.
How can I give an unbias answer, my bias is going to influence my answer, so I can't give you one. I'm not trying to be an azz here, I just want you to think about what you're saying or asking. The wording in your statements and questions, cancel each other out
I have one for you

where have you read people at your age getting results from HGH at those doses? I'd like to read it, HGH is age dependent, the older you are the better the results.
At my age, I wouldn't see much from that HGH cycle, but my bias on HGH is, I won't pay for it anymore, I'll pay a co-pay but to buy kits, it's not going to happen, for me anyway. It's not worth the money out put for the returns you get.
JohnnyB