Weighing Heavy Metals
Catherine Guthrie
taken from: http://www.lifetimefitness.com/maga...ntArticleId=362
Mercury in fish and dental fillings. Lead in old paint. Cadmium and arsenic in industrial wastes. There's a lot of talk about heavy-metal toxins these days. But how worried should you be, really? And what can you do to protect yourself?
What would you think if someone asked you to consume a dose of heavy metals every day for the rest of your life? Most likely, you'd be horrified. But truth be told, you're already doing it. Everyone ingests small amounts of arsenic, cadmium, lead and mercury daily. It's not an option or an immodest proposal - it's an environmental mandate.
The environment, unfortunately, is laden with heavy metals, mostly as a result of big-industry waste. But what people may not realize is that many heavy metals get a free pass into the body, day in and day out, through the lungs, digestive tract and skin. We aren't just talking about the blue-collar worker who toils as a lead smelter, but also the average office worker, adolescent and stay-at-home mom. Anyone who eats a fish sandwich, inhales secondhand smoke, drinks a glass of water or simply breathes air can be exposed.
Heavy-metal toxins is one of those doomsday topics that makes John Q. Public and even some medical experts want to scoff and look away. But the threat is real, and while the extent of the potential damage is still being debated, you don't have to wait to begin protecting yourself. There are dozens of simple ways to minimize your exposure and curtail potential dangers.
The key is to be proactive about what you can change and mindful about what you can't. Knowing what you're up against can help you strike a healthy balance, and may inspire you to learn more about the heated environmental and political debates that surround this important issue.
Metal Detection
Of all the heavy metals in the environment, the most abundant and potentially deadly are arsenic, cadmium, lead and mercury. A metal is considered “heavy” if its gravity is at least five times heavier than water. The density of heavy metals increases the probability that they will end up in soil and water.
Heavy metals are an equal-opportunity offender. Since everyone eats food grown in tainted soil and breathes air contaminated by pollutants, no one gets off entirely toxin-free. The body, though, deserves kudos for doing its best to purge heavy metals. A large percentage of metals are excreted through sweat, urine and the bowels. What the body can't toss, it socks away in places that aren't so immediately vital to maintaining life, such as fat, teeth and bones.
When heavy metals build up faster than the body can eliminate them, it's called bioaccumulation. Scientists are just beginning to understand the seriousness of it. And before they can hope to accurately access the health ramifications of heavy metals, they first must get a better idea of what they are up against. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is aiming to do just that.
In 2003, the CDC published the second in an ongoing series of reports tracking Americans' exposure to chemicals in the environment (a third report is due this year). Scientists at the CDC tested approximately 2,500 men, women and children for 116 household chemicals. They looked for everything from the synthetic components found in new carpets to chemicals found in nail polish. What they found was disturbing: Everyone, regardless of age, race or gender, had traceable levels of manmade chemicals in his or her body. “We've known that toxins in the environment could wind up in humans, but this is the first time we've actually been able to see it,” says Jim Pirkle, PhD, and the study's lead investigator. “This is not what might have gotten into you, this is what did get into you.”
Alarming as that may sound, many mainstream scientists, including Pirkle, say not to fret. “Just because you can measure something in people doesn't mean it's dangerous,” he asserts. Indeed, the CDC report (available at www.cdc.gov/exposure report/2nd) draws few overt conclusions. Instead, it lists raw data and repeatedly notes that “further study is necessary” to determine the concentrations at which various chemicals pose a threat to human health. But in the meantime, should we really be assuming we are safe?
Researchers who conducted another human toxic-burden study released in 2003 think not. The BodyBurden study (www.ewg.org/reports/bodyburden), a joint project by the Environmental Working Group (EWG), the Mt. Sinai School of Medicine, and Commonweal (a nonprofit health and environmental research institute), looked for 167 chemicals in nine volunteers and found an average of 91 industrial compounds, pollutants and other chemicals in their blood and urine. Their general conclusion: That what we don't know about the effects of all these combined chemicals could be hurting us, and until they are proven safe, we should consider them with caution.
“The CDC studied individual chemicals in a whole lot of people; we studied individual people for a whole lot of chemicals,” says Tim Kropp, PhD, a senior scientist with the EWG. He points out that while the CDC's research looks at exposure levels across the population, the EWG study is the first to look “at the complex reality of the human body burden - what we call the 'pollution in people.'”
Both studies, according to Kropp, reveal some disturbing gaps in our scientific understanding of environmental contaminants and point to weakness in our system of regulatory safeguards. “The CDC looks at whether or not a person is over the federal standard for a single chemical, like lead,” explains Kropp. “Our goal is to approximate real life by studying what happens when you add all these chemicals up. What is the effect of a bunch of heavy metals and other chemicals on a woman's reproductive system? Right now, we don't know.”
While the researchers are doing the math and debating the precise levels at which heavy metals and other toxins become dangerous to us in theory, some clinicians are taking a more pragmatic approach, trying to help individuals reduce exposure and eliminate the toxins already in their systems.
“Heavy-metal exposure is a serious health problem,” says Walter Crinnion, a naturopathic physician and director of the Environmental Medicine Center at the Southwest College of Naturopathic Medicine in Tempe, Ariz. Over the years, Crinnion has treated hundreds of patients suffering from heavy-metal toxicity. “Do we all have them in our bodies? Absolutely,” he says. “Will they affect your health? It depends.”