I got this table from an article on steroidworld.com....dont know if tis right....maybe somebody could verify it for me!
http://www.steroidworld.com/compare.htm
I got this table from an article on steroidworld.com....dont know if tis right....maybe somebody could verify it for me!
http://www.steroidworld.com/compare.htm
in my eye's thats a load of crap mate
no open source posting
keep all source request's to PM'S please
someone once said to me a clever man learn's by his own mistake's. But a wise man learn's by the mistake's of other people.
detailed detection timesat least 45 day's active use and 100 posts for a source checkunsure about the rule's please read up
thread for first cycle choices
SOURCE CHECKS CLICK HERE
lol,okOriginally Posted by stocky121
We have one of those here....http://www.steroid.com/effect.php
Originally Posted by 01dragonslayer
and so is that one lol
thay are both well outdated
no open source posting
keep all source request's to PM'S please
someone once said to me a clever man learn's by his own mistake's. But a wise man learn's by the mistake's of other people.
detailed detection timesat least 45 day's active use and 100 posts for a source checkunsure about the rule's please read up
thread for first cycle choices
SOURCE CHECKS CLICK HERE
thanx bro, much more elaborate and hopefully accurate!Originally Posted by 01dragonslayer
those suck... growth hormone more anabolic than deca etc etc... load of crap...
outdated in my opinion
I dont think the 100% crap. But you have to keep in mind 90% of the game is diet. You can take drol deca with test and not gain a pound if your diet is not right.
Take it for what it is a reference guide.
outdated for sure
You can take drol deca with test and not gain a pound if your diet is not right.
i agree with this......
sure but my point is that te graph is completely artificial and has pretty mch no logic behind it and outdated for sure.. JMO
Originally Posted by stupidhippo
i have to agree not very accurate at all.
no open source posting
keep all source request's to PM'S please
someone once said to me a clever man learn's by his own mistake's. But a wise man learn's by the mistake's of other people.
detailed detection timesat least 45 day's active use and 100 posts for a source checkunsure about the rule's please read up
thread for first cycle choices
SOURCE CHECKS CLICK HERE
its a shame too cause its one of the reasons why so many noobs come here and suggest a deca only cycle... wonder how many will just go ahead and do it without consulting..
For every one kid that comes here and asks about whether his cycles is proper or not there are probably dozens of kids that just go ahead and do it anyways.
Cheers,
Joe
I think it's pretty good, but nothing like adding all the 10's up and making up your cycle, just to give you a general idea it's good.
Originally Posted by gsxxr
said it all
right, in ya'll opinion, which are the best mass builders taht KEEP gains (dont bother with dosage) if diet is right?
to keep gains tren var and test.
Originally Posted by topgun1983
The best 3 are Tbol,winny,primo and masteron,whatever you gain with these you keep.It`s funney that the weak drug`s build the most quality muscle that sticks with you,people don`t get that.Winny at 200 ED is a pure muscle builder,in under 3 weeks I have gianed 3 pounds of muscle in a cutter![]()
Last edited by goose; 04-01-2006 at 04:57 PM.
That table is way too outdated to comment on. A reference maybe, but not anything to abide by 100%.
What ever happened to hooker redoing that chart?
Originally Posted by goose4
you must be bold.
Originally Posted by gsxxr
Not really....it`s with primo and Andriol the two safest drugs,this enables me in my cycle to hit winny very hard for the finish.So the mass gained during a cycle of of these will be very hard and defined.
Winny and tbol gains are pretty solid.
it sure gives you an idea about the prices or are they too incorrect!Originally Posted by Jayhova
tbol?Originally Posted by Kappa Capo
what kind of cycle would you run tbol and winny at?
and what about sust 250 for building and holding quality muscle?
after so long tables cycles get out of date but there seems to be sum truth in sum of the compounds on the chart....DaRkOmEn
Sustanon sucks for that, the 4-ester mix if stupid for building.Originally Posted by topgun1983
People think its the bomb but how the f**k do people wanna inject low dose from every ester when they can get more power and gains from using the same amount from one ester.
oral-turinabol a.k.a tbol.
I wouldnt run oral only cycle, so these one's bellow is good from solid mass.
Prop,winny
Prop,tbol
prop,tren,winny
prop,tren
and so on...
intersting reply....then what do you thik sust is good for?Originally Posted by Kappa Capo
May go for prop and tren...thanks.
long ago, many thought that sust would take longer to cause receptor downgrade because of the multiple esters. this has since shown to either not be the case or not be noticeable enough to be worthwhile, especially for the price.Originally Posted by topgun1983
as far as what sust is good for? i'd like to hear from someone a good answer to that. personally, i think you'd be better off buying each of it's compounds seperately and injecting them seperately. at least that way, you'd save a lot of money and not get the mix which usually tends to be underdosed by most companies anyways.
some people like ester blend some people like one ester test
i've used cyp eth and prop and i've just started my 3rd week of my sust cycle i want to see how i feel about sust it's good to hear what everyone say's but you need to find out for yourself if you like it or not
no open source posting
keep all source request's to PM'S please
someone once said to me a clever man learn's by his own mistake's. But a wise man learn's by the mistake's of other people.
detailed detection timesat least 45 day's active use and 100 posts for a source checkunsure about the rule's please read up
thread for first cycle choices
SOURCE CHECKS CLICK HERE
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)