Releasing of footage of plane hitting the Pentagon in the news

[USfighterFC]

Well pretty ironic isnt it. they're showing the news conference as we speak then they're showing the video

[MAXIMA5]

No $hit. WHAt channel?

that is eeriily ironic.

[USfighterFC]

No $hit. WHAt channel?

that is eeriily ironic.

They're talking about it on Fox News right now but I'm sure they'll play it on all the major news networks.

[SwoleCat]

What are they saying about it?

~SC~

[USfighterFC]

It's another security camera footage at almost the exact same angle as the one we've all seen. But in this one you can see the cone of the front of the plane right before it hits.

[biglouie250]

and the conspiracy/missle guys go run and hide.........

[USfighterFC]

Unfortunately it isnt damning evidence but it shows the cone is bigger than a cruise missile

[MAXIMA5]

Unfortunately it isnt damning evidence but it shows the cone is bigger than a cruise missile

Maybe it was a drone space shuttle.

[SVTMuscle*]

I think it is uncessary. They banned the footage of the planes hitting the towers, they should do the same with the pentagon. No need to bring back the horror, yet a discussion would be good

[RA]

For the conspiracy people, the footage will never be good enough. They are going to think what they want.

[binny]

oh come on.........its like 4 or 5 frames and dont tell me that u cant doctor a frame.......plus why did they take so long to realease it........from what i see theres nothing "confidential" in those frames.....and regarding seeing the cone...........i cant see any cone.....u do see an object but it appears in what 1 or 2 frames.....if it was real it should have been in all the frames

[USfighterFC]

oh come on.........its like 4 or 5 frames and dont tell me that u cant doctor a frame.......plus why did they take so long to realease it........from what i see theres nothing "confidential" in those frames.....and regarding seeing the cone...........i cant see any cone.....u do see an object but it appears in what 1 or 2 frames.....if it was real it should have been in all the frames

Well when something is traveling at around 500mph it kinda moves fast.

[63190]

Did it have wings or not? If it was a passenger plane it would have pretty big wings. If it was a smaller Sezna or what ever private plane, smaller wings, but still lareger than a cruise missile.

[USfighterFC]

Did it have wings or not? If it was a passenger plane it would have pretty big wings. If it was a smaller Sezna or what ever private plane, smaller wings, but still lareger than a cruise missile.

You cant see any of that. The camera takes pictures in half second frames. So you see the start of something and the next frame is an explosion.

[USfighterFC]

Apparently nobody here has seen the explosive power of a cruise missile because the explosion at the Pentagon was a SHITLOAD bigger than that of a cruisemissile and they're not penetrating weapons so I highly doubt a cruisemissile can penetrate 3 rings of the Pentagon. Plus cruisemissiles dont make huge fireballs like that. They're filled with high explosives not combustables. Go watch some more movies.

[novicenovicen]

Actually I know from experience, that we make warheads capable of penetrating very far before explosion.

[63190]

What I saw of the half second frames sucks. The huge explosion could have been secondaries. IE: natural gas or oil for heaters.

[USfighterFC]

Actually I know from experience, that we make warheads capable of penetrating very far before explosion.

Right but not on cruise missiles.

[63190]

Actually I know from experience, that we make warheads capable of penetrating very far before explosion.

Oh yeah, you just put a delay timer on the explosioin.

[novicenovicen]

Technically all that would need replacing is the nose cone and a reinforced hull and it could be done. But if I were going to do it I wouldn't be using a cruise missile either.

[USfighterFC]

What I saw of the half second frames sucks. The huge explosion could have been secondaries. IE: natural gas or oil for heaters.

Firstly oil wouldnt explode like that. There must be a huge storage of natural gas for that to happen OR their could've been 36,000 pounds of high flammable jet fuel AND a 100 ton plane to smash into a building.

[USfighterFC]

Oh yeah, you just put a delay timer on the explosioin.

You can time delay it all you want a cruise missle is way to light to make any penetration on a 3 foot thick stone wall and penetrate 3 rings into the Pentagon. Thats over 18 feet of solid stone. Its like your foot being the pentagon and a can being the missile. Stomp on the can and you'll get you're result.

[novicenovicen]

C4 has a high explosion rate.

[novicenovicen]

C4 has a high explosion rate.

[novicenovicen]

C4 has a high explosion rate.

[USfighterFC]

c-4 also doesnt make fireballs by itself.

[novicenovicen]

Easily fixed by any natural gas or fuel source. jet fuel would make a nice one.

[Timm1704]

oh come on.........its like 4 or 5 frames and dont tell me that u cant doctor a frame.......plus why did they take so long to realease it........from what i see theres nothing "confidential" in those frames.....and regarding seeing the cone...........i cant see any cone.....u do see an object but it appears in what 1 or 2 frames.....if it was real it should have been in all the frames

exactly my thoughts

[USfighterFC]

There was 36,000 gallons of jet fuel on that plane. A barrel holds 42 gallons in it. It would take about 857 barrels of fuel to make that explosion. Not that easy to hide. A natural gas pipeline woud've had to been shut off and would've continiously burned and to get an explosion like that it would've had to have been a MONSTER pipeline.

[USfighterFC]

exactly my thoughts

They said because they didnt want to release it during the zacharias mossaoui trial

[SVTMuscle*]

"It's digitally created"

I can see it now

[Swifto]

Releasing CCTV footage from the surrounding hotel and gas station(s) would be intresting. So....Why hasnt this been done?

Hidding someting.....

[~fuelforfire~]

i could give a **** less about this shit anymore lol

[USfighterFC]

Releasing CCTV footage from the surrounding hotel and gas station(s) would be intresting. So....Why hasnt this been done?

Hidding someting.....

You ever see where the Pentagon is? There are no gas stations or hotels directly around it. It's sitting almost by itself with a couple major highways and a few buildings nearby. I guess you can only go on the several thousand people who witnessed it personally.

[spencer]

http://www.ogrish.com/archives/2006/...-crash-911.wmv

[USfighterFC]

i could give a **** less about this shit anymore lol

I honestly can't even believe that I'm still trying.

[tiger909]

there is a hotel that had a camera footage of the pentagon crash, however within forty minutes it was confiscated by the cia

[cfiler]

http://www.ogrish.com/archives/2006/...-crash-911.wmv

That site has some really guesome stuff. Too vivid for me.

[USfighterFC]

there is a hotel that had a camera footage of the pentagon crash, however within forty minutes it was confiscated by the cia

Says who and where is your source and do make sure its credible and not from some conspiracy theory jockey.

[Psychotron]

I didn't know this mattered, what was the point of covering this up if it did in fact happen? Does this have something to do with the morons who think it was our own government who was behind 9/11 ?