
Originally Posted by
thegodfather
This has been gone over so many times in the passed, but bros dont seem to learn. I dont have the energy to regurgitate a bunch of legal jargen right now that most people would argue with anyway. So let me just say, the officer should have issued you a summons to appear in court or arrested you. One of the two things must have happend in order for you to be charged. Also, there must be a clear 'chain of custody' of the confiscated gear, so the chances he pocketed it are not likely. If, however you end up not getting any notice from the court then I would get a lawyer. If the officers overhead light rack was turned on during the stop, there is a video&audio record of the stop. So, if he confiscated gear from you, yet failed to issue you a summons, AND did not turn the gear into evidence(all highly unlikely) then you have a case against him. Although, it would not be in your best interests to go afer the police for stealing your drugs, basically.
The stop already happend, and you already got your gear confiscated. So I'm going to avoid the hole heated debate over when cops have probable cause to search, or a search incident to arrest, and various other things. Most people are under the impression a cop needs a written ****ing warrant to go through your car, and that just isn't true.