Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: 2nd Cycle Help

  1. #1

    2nd Cycle Help

    I'm 31years old, 6ft, about 240lbs, and medium to low body fat. I have done one cycle before, 12wks 500mg Test E.

    Looking to take a test/deca cycle. This is what my supplier has:
    100mg enan + 100mg cyp + 200mg deca 400mg/ml 10ml

    I was thinking of a 10wk cycle, injecting the above 2 times a week. And of course proper pct.

    Any input guys?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Rising from my Ashes !!
    Posts
    9,717
    hmmm thats an interesting mix, as both tests are long esters and won't even fully kick in until about 6-8 weeks. I like to have the test higher than the deca, but there is a debate on that in another thread around here somewhere.

    I would run it for 12 weeks minimum if it were me, but that is JMHO

    What are your goals for this cycle? What kind of training and diet and cardio?

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by SMAN12B
    hmmm thats an interesting mix, as both tests are long esters and won't even fully kick in until about 6-8 weeks. I like to have the test higher than the deca, but there is a debate on that in another thread around here somewhere.

    I would run it for 12 weeks minimum if it were me, but that is JMHO

    What are your goals for this cycle? What kind of training and diet and cardio?
    Looking to put on some size and then next time I cycle I was going to try a cutter. I train an 2 days on 1 day off routine. I have a very clean diet.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    West Coast
    Posts
    564
    Damn sman, some of the members are ripping on me for suggesting that test be run higher than the complimentary AAS in a stack. I guess some members in here don't respect other members opinions. And I thought that wasn't the way things run around here....

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Rising from my Ashes !!
    Posts
    9,717
    Quote Originally Posted by pdog80
    Damn sman, some of the members are ripping on me for suggesting that test be run higher than the complimentary AAS in a stack. I guess some members in here don't respect other members opinions. And I thought that wasn't the way things run around here....

    It is NOT set in stone to do it that way, but it is usually the safer way to go especially when adding compounds that will shut you down hard.
    Some people will run test at a lower dose and if that works for them that is fine. Again, it is a general rule but not set in stone

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    East Coast
    Posts
    4,561
    Quote Originally Posted by pdog80
    Damn sman, some of the members are ripping on me for suggesting that test be run higher than the complimentary AAS in a stack. I guess some members in here don't respect other members opinions. And I thought that wasn't the way things run around here....
    this isnt true bro. as the thread i started was to debate the issue. its basically that neither person is wrong. if you like running test higher then do it nothing wrong with it. the point was everyone reacts differently to things and some people do feel they need to run it higher. some dont.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •