will it really differ in terms of gains and sides ?
will it really differ in terms of gains and sides ?
I don't do HRT but it would seem logical that yes, a person with 2x the test in them will have better recovery from work outs than one that has less.
i cant tell a difference in either one when i cruise.. thus the reason i stick w/ ~135mg/wk
i am asking for my test deca cycle tai..
wouldnt make a lick of difference imo.. infact i doubt you would see any change in gains 100mg/wk vs 500mg/wk from test assuming ur running 400-600mg decaOriginally Posted by fitguy
For me I notice a difference between 200mg to 400mg a week.
If you are talking about in between cycles and running it for years there will probably be a difference. I mean it wont be huge in terms of immediate gains or something. But assuming you are dedicated and know what you are doing in both dietary and training aspects then ya sure I can bet after years of cruising a person using 300mg per week will have better success than someone who had been running 100mg per week.
But its all speculation because I havent tried this, and like I said it would be a long term difference and minimal at that.
no i meant will gains from deca400mg and test 250mg be way different from say test at 125mg and the same deca dose..peace
i keep my hrt dose at 125-150mg of test/wk. if i do want to cycle another compound, usually tren or deca, i don't raise my test dose because there is no reason to do so as tai says. before i went on hrt, i would keep the test dose at least 100mg more than the deca dose. if you're worried about ed issues, make sure you have the usual ancillaries on hand, e.g., cialis, proviron, hcg, caber, etc. i seem to do ok with just hcg and cialis, but whatever works for you is ok.
what about your gains ,does the low dose of test affect your gains?
wow your like goin around in circles..Originally Posted by fitguy
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)