
Originally Posted by
WLlewellyn
Good morning fellas,
I read what some of you are saying, and can appreciate your concerns. However, I do want to reiterate that I had when I wrote that, and still do, believe that there is nothing “wrong” with running a cycle without testosterone. Here are a few points to consider:
1) From the 1960 through the 1980’s, if you were an athlete, the first cycle you took was probably Dianabol (methandrostenolone) @ 2-5 tabs/day. Dianabol was the introduction most players had to steroids. This drug worked extremely well, and arguably changed the face of sports. Neither steroids nor human physiology has changed since.
2) Methandrostenolone is moderately androgenic/estrogenic. In a sufficient dose it is usually more than enough to maintain libido, energy, and sense of wellness.
3) Many people, especially those new to AAS, refuse to inject themselves. For these people, a cycle of dbol or Anadrol may be the most effective options they have.
All strong steroids are also strong suppressors of the HPTA. Testosterone maintains libido so well because it is the primary male androgen/estrogen source. If you have libido issues, adding testosterone to a cycle will usually correct them. The balance of anabolic activity to side effects (health specific) w/testosterone is also better than just about anything. But this should not be mistaken for this hormone being a necessity. Many AAS work very well on their own. Your mileage may vary, of course.
And just to correct one other thing. I am a very strong supporter of PCT, and the sections before and after the sample cycles in ANABOLICS both detail the need for PCT. The PoWeR program using HCG+Clo+Nolv is highlighted in the book.