Differences between GHRP and CJC

[Hephens]

I cannot find this anywhere, what is the actual difference between GHRP and CJC? Is there actually any differences in taking both or do they both stimulate different areas i'm confused. I'm takeing GHRP2(150mcg) and MOD-GRF(100mcg) which is short acting cjc 2-4/day atm. Thing is they both seem the same as if i were to take GHRP2 by itself.

[DanB]

CJC is a GHRH growth hormone releasing hormone
GHRP is growth hormone releasing hexapeptide

The main differences without going into too much detail is GHRH is natural in the body and is what stimulates the pituitary gland which in turn secretes GH, it is what tells the body to secrete GH hence why we inject it, to trick the body into giving us another nice pulse
GHRP is not natural and was developed to stimulate GH release, but is nowhere near as effective as a GHRH, they both stimulate different receptors and this could be part of the reason they are substantially more effective when combined together

To run either of them alone is a waste in my opinion as you will see little to no benefit from it except increased hunger from GHRP 6

[956Vette]

Thing is they both seem the same as if i were to take GHRP2 by itself.

Great topic Hephens, interested to see what develops here (besides elaboration on the actual differences between GHRP/GHRH)

[DCannon]

Basically GHRP's stimulate a pulse of GH and GHRH's amplify that pulse. This is why it GHRH's are useless on their own. You would have to inject them during a GH pulse for them to be effective, but there is no way of really knowing when your body actually has these pulses.

[ScotchGuard02]

I've been on HGH for going on my 5th year 5iu/ed. Any reason for me to stop the HGH and start on the peptides? Is there an advantage of the peptides over HGH? I haven't seen any long term use studies of the peptides.

[Times Roman]

I've been on HGH for going on my 5th year 5iu/ed. Any reason for me to stop the HGH and start on the peptides? Is there an advantage of the peptides over HGH? I haven't seen any long term use studies of the peptides.

the use of peps for most is in it's early stages, including mine. I did an 8 month cycle with both, and tbh, not sure if much of a benefit. but.... they were stuck in customs in kabul, out in the sun and heat, for a few months, so that could have had an impact on the effectiveness. I'm trying again, and with a different supplier.

If you have the cash and are happy with the results, and don't feel like the gamble with peps, i'd stick with what you are doing.

i went with peps since it runs me about $150/mo compared to a couple of grand with the GH. And unless you have a lock on some legit product, then GH is a pretty big gamble, too

[lovbyts]

It is claimed that using the HGH can de sensitize your natural production where as using the peptides only boost your natural production and will not shut down your natural production.

Hmmm I wonder how a mix of both would work???

[ScotchGuard02]

Yeah, I've been reading that bluetop (that's what I use) HGH is a gamble at best. Fortunately, during my business travels I was able to visit the lab and meet the scientist that makes my bluetops. So far so good. I've never mixed peptides let alone use them. I'm always looking for a better alternative.

[956Vette]

I've been on HGH for going on my 5th year 5iu/ed. Any reason for me to stop the HGH and start on the peptides? Is there an advantage of the peptides over HGH? I haven't seen any long term use studies of the peptides.

Keep w/ what works, what's user friendly & has longer data - HGH remains the king of the growth peptides imho