Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Another potential 2nd cycle would appreciate advice

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    265

    Another potential 2nd cycle would appreciate advice

    Still trying to decide on 2nd cycle, can get a number of compounds. I'm 28, 5'10, 200lbs, bf just under 15%
    week 1-10. Test 400 (mix of test enanthate, cypionate and decanoate). Inject monday
    Week 1-10. Test cypionate 400mg inject thurs
    Week 5-10. Anavar 75-100 mg per day
    I'll run letro as an AI alongside and PCT of Clomid 100/50/50 tamoxifen 40/40/20 starting 2 weeks after last jab. I'm looking for lean hard muscle growth, iv heard the test 400 will promote muscle growth and the cyp will promote hardness . How does this look?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    13,685
    This cycle is on the bad side bro.To much test you dont need 800mg test 2nd cycle.%00 is fine.Letro isnt ideal for a ai use Adex pct needs to be 4 weeks.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    METHAMERICA
    Posts
    16,397
    More of a question than any advise. Test being test why not just pick one and run with it?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    265
    Quote Originally Posted by Lunk1
    More of a question than any advise. Test being test why not just pick one and run with it?
    That's a fair question, just basically from
    What I read the different test esters and compounds have slightly different muscle building properties, I'm looking to increase size but with lean gains. They are both 200mg per ml, so if I do 1ml of test 400, and 1ml of test c that's a total of 400mg test a week, as SongDog says 800 may be too much so il take his advice

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    METHAMERICA
    Posts
    16,397
    My understanding of it is (limited as it may be) that test is test is test. The only real difference is the amount of time it takes for the compound to "kick in" and the half life which changes the frequecy injections are required.

    Ayone have any knowledge of one type of test having different muscle building properties than another?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    265
    Quote Originally Posted by Lunk1
    My understanding of it is (limited as it may be) that test is test is test. The only real difference is the amount of time it takes for the compound to "kick in" and the half life which changes the frequecy injections are required.

    Ayone have any knowledge of one type of test having different muscle building properties than another?
    That's a good point I'd like to
    Know that too. I think that there are slightly different modes of action of the different test compounds, they all have pretty much the same anabolic effect, but from what iv read there are slight differences in their properties. It's difficult to know if what you read is accurate or not

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    401
    I think test is test, its just how long the ester takes to kick in. Its all the same..

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •