NPP or Tren.A .. Next cycle

[some1else]

Hello everyone,

I'm thinking of starting my new cycle sometime soon, and I was pondering about it and wether I should go with Tren.Ace or NPP.

Previously in the past I ran Tren.E, a gave me amazing gigantic results.. However, I ran it for too long and got jaundice.. And lost all the weight I had gained.

I then got cleared by a gastroenterologist and ran NPP.. Due to the fact that I was scared I could have developed an allergy to Tren (which idk if that can happen lol).. But to sum it up, NPP was nice, but def nothing compared to Tren.E as far as results, just didn't give me the body results I was looking for, mentality, etc...
Maybe NPP doesn't work as good for me, everyone reacts different to different compounds either more or less.

So now.. I'm here.. Thinking wether I should do NPP again, maybe higher dose... Or Tren Ace.. Can you develop allergies to Tren?.....Or something else if you suggest.. Or more things at once.

About me..
This will be my.. 4th cycle (I can tell I was a noob b4,no longer now)
Height 5'10
Weight 165
Metabolism.. Way too fast
Age 26
Social security.. Jk jk

[Black]

You still have a lot to learn. And a lot to gain naturally. Your diet needs help. Anabolics aren't what you need. You need food.

I mainly just read your stats. I went back and read the whole post and you have no business using anabolics. 4 cycles and you only weigh 160? Jaundice?! Seriously? Very reckless.

[gold43]

You still have a lot to learn. And a lot to gain naturally. Your diet needs help. Anabolics aren't what you need. You need food.

I mainly just read your stats. I went back and read the whole post and you have no business using anabolics. 4 cycles and you only weigh 160? Jaundice?! Seriously? Very reckless.

^^Agreed!!

[lovbyts]

Wow, really? 5'10" 160 lbs. Dont blame your sh*tty diet on a fast matabalism. If you really believe that then you are even more clueless than a rock.

Stop the juice. Learn to eat/diet and train properly.

[king6 II]

Agreed with above, unless you can fully understand just how important diet it, you will loose anything you gain with any cycle. At 5'10" 160, your previous cycles have been a waste and the only thing you have accomplished was damaging your body.

[kelkel]

The truth isn't always what you want to hear. Visit the nutrition forum and let the vets there help you. Food is the most anabolic thing you have. And a "fast metabolism" can be a blessing.

[some1else]

I was sick and got to 150.. I'm 165 now.. I'm climbing up.
I didn't say I was going to run it right now... I said some time soon.

My plan is to run it when I get to 175
So you all chillax and just tell me what would be better.. Tren.a or NPP.

[kelkel]

Nobody's opinion will change. You still need to gain much more weight. Max out your natural capabilities then cycle.

[MuscleInk]

Nobody's opinion will change. You still need to gain much more weight. Max out your natural capabilities then cycle.

A lot of guys "say" they aren't cycling now, but as soon as they get their advice, they cycle right away. Lol.

No one is saying don't run either compound. They are simply saying achieve your natural potential first, then cycle. Anyone not gaining weight, simply isn't eating enough and steroids won't fix that. It won't matter if you run tren, NPP or both at the same time if you haven't learned to eat to grow. All the guys are really saying is to lay the foundation for success by eating to grow. Once you've mastered that, you will have better success with gear because you will have already committed to one of the most important variables in body building: NUTRITION.

Now, if your question is about the risk/benefit comparison of each, then that is another question. Most guys will still tell you that nutrition is where you start and steroids are where you finish, but if all you're asking is which compound (tren vs. NPP) is safer or produces better effects (and remember, select the compounds for your GOALS, not just their effects) then reading through the steroid profiles should provide most of the answers you seek.

[king6 II]

I was sick and got to 150.. I'm 165 now.. I'm climbing up.
I didn't say I was going to run it right now... I said some time soon.

My plan is to run it when I get to 175
So you all chillax and just tell me what would be better.. Tren.a or NPP.

That's kind of like asking what would be better, a big mac or a whopper. To each is his own, nobody reacts the same to each compound and no one has the same side effects either. But again, until your diet is adjusted to maintain newly made muscle you will loose it all again.

[lovbyts]

I was sick and got to 150.. I'm 165 now.. I'm climbing up.
I didn't say I was going to run it right now... I said some time soon.

My plan is to run it when I get to 175
So you all chillax and just tell me what would be better.. Tren.a or NPP.

I'm 5' 8" and would not consider running a cycle under 180 lbs unless I was around 10% bf.

No need for Tren or NPP especially at this point. Once you are ready (a couple of years of hard training and diet) then Test only until you have a good base. If you dont have an adequate base then you are throwing your money away. One of the comparisons I like to use is having a stock 2000 Honda Civic and running high octane gas. You wont see any real performance gains. Run high octane gas in a modified engine and you will see a big difference vs pump gas.

[Bert]

I've been going with npp or deca as tren is only in me precontest.