Tren is 5x as strong as test, but...?

[Varenagan]

Approaching this from a logical point of view would tren being 5x as strong as test actually mean that taking 500mg tren a week would be the same as taking 2500mg test a week? Forget about the side effects/gyno, I'm purely talking about them having equal effectiveness at building muscle mass based on the androgenic ratio between the two compounds.

[< <Samson> >]

Nah,


I don't think so


If your body could take two and a half g's of test I think you would see much better gains than lets say one fifth of tren


It's just about how our body can partition this shit IMO

[DOSA]

completely two different chemicals.

please do not just lump all AAS in one group. each chemical is different.

[Varenagan]

completely two different chemicals.

please do not just lump all AAS in one group. each chemical is different.

That's why I said to disregard the side effects from tren and the gyno from test. I mean their ability to add mass based on the 5:1 ratio.

[DAAS]

You would have similar anabolism from 1/5th the amount of tren. Disregarding all other aspects of the drugs. but example: I think you'd be far more hungry on 2000mg of test than you would on 400mg of tren. Food is what causes gains. Also tren put more stress on your body. also estrogen can help in the growth process. its not apples to apples. but stictly from a chemical stand point, tren is 5 times more anabolic than test is most people, ratios don't always equate to gains though.

[Times Roman]

there is no linear correlation between the dose and the strength/size gains.

taking twice as much test does NOT give you twice the gains.

same with tren.

[jimmyinkedup]

The A/A ratio can be a bit deceptive. It is just a guide - for not take it for any more than that. It is impossible to make the assumption that gains would say be the same if you ran 500mgs tren or 2500mgs test..