First, sorry about your wife, I sincerely hope things turn out well.
I'm not sure I can give you a satisfactory answer to primo versus mast, but I'll try. Understand that there is zero science coming, its just me babbling. Do your own research
Early on, I ran Mast in cycles and never really felt it did much when running it with Test. Similar to EQ for me. But it was maybe because I was inexperienced and didn't realize the subtly of it. As I evolved, I just kept leaning more and more on Test, with a little deca or whatever thrown in. The sides from high Test were usually the more noticeable and irritating. Eventually I tried Tren... hated it, then I tried tren with Mast, and loved it. Mast really shines in balancing out Tren for me, but Test was still my go-to and I still had the sides.... water retention and flushed face especially. Fast forward a bit, finally ran Primo...
(bro Science analogy coming) As Mast is to Tren, Primo is to Test. IMHO, running low-dose Test with high Primo gives me everything high Test runs do, but with zero sides. Test has an anabolic rating of 100, I think Primo is around 90. In fact, I run TRT doses of Test now, 150-200, and maybe 600 Primo and I just love it. It's not an ideal AAS if you're truly looking to bulk, but I'm old and my growth potential is limited, but my "lean bulk(ish)" chances are still out there. All I know is it works for me, and I feel great when on it.
Yeah, its expensive relative to Test. Not expensive relative to real HGH.
Of course... All this talk comes with the huge disclaimer that when you buying Uground gear, who the fuck knows what I'm really taking. I might just be taking shit-tons of Test labeled wrong
