View Poll Results: which file system.....

Voters
23. You may not vote on this poll
  • NTFS

    17 73.91%
  • FAT32

    6 26.09%
Results 1 to 17 of 17

Thread: NTFS or FAT32 ??

  1. #1

    Arrow NTFS or FAT32 ??

    which file system do you use ?? i recently reformatted into NTFS and to me it seems like it runs slower.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    557
    NTFS all the way bro. It is more robust, has better security, and uses disk space more efficiently than fat32. As for speed, I wouldn't think you would notice much, but it really depends on your overall system specs.

    Peace,

    CC

  3. #3
    LORDBLiTZ Guest
    Fat32 is waaaaay faster.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    5,506
    Fat32 is faster, but the 2.4GB file size limit was crippling my DV video editing and DVD writing. I didn't have a choice to "upgrade" to NTFS

    Red

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    557
    This topic has been debated many times. However, IMO I don't think FAT32 is faster then NTFS. There might be "some" scenarios where FAT32 is faster, but again, there are many variables to consider. If your hard drive is large in size, if you are working with large files, and if you have a good amount of ram, or if you are interested in data security, then NTFS is the right choice. Here are some links to help you choose which is best for you.

    http://www.ntfs.com/ntfs_vs_fat.htm

    http://www.spcug.org/reviews/bl0203.htm

    http://www.ntfs.com/quest2.htm

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    In the Gym, if i could
    Posts
    15,927
    bump... and the new windows... "Longhorn" will be the next step...
    The answer to your every question

    Rules

    A bigot is a person obstinately or intolerantly devoted
    to his or her own opinions and prejudices, especially
    one exhibiting intolerance, and animosity toward those of differing beliefs.


    If you get scammed by an UGL listed on this board or by another member here, it's all part of the game and learning experience for you,
    we do not approve nor support any sources that may be listed on this site.
    I will not do source checks for you, the peer review from other members should be enough to help you make a decision on your quest. Buyer beware.
    Don't Let the Police kick your ass

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    There is no place like ho
    Posts
    3,688
    NTFS for security and stablity, Fat 32 for speed. I would rather security and stability over speed any day.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Posts
    1,012
    File size limits of fat32 make this decision a no brainer
    -Cy

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    137

    reiserfs 4 ofcourse :)

    no seriously.. for windows NTFS for a journaling file system for sure.. it is slowing for most things however there are many benefits over fat32

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Mil-town
    Posts
    1,189
    If you partition your harddrive to have multiple operating systems, such as windows XP, and windows 2000( for applications that dont run on XP ) or XP and linux, FAT32 is the way to go, because it allows you to still access information located on the other drive or operating system

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Out of Control
    Posts
    7,418
    NTFS is best for noobies.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    300
    Being that you spend a lot of time on boards like this, go NTFS for security. You shouldn't notice a speed difference, unless you have a Gateway or something

  13. #13
    NTFS period! So much more stable it's no comparison!

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    England
    Posts
    1,098
    guys FAT32 is milli seconds faster. i do alot of DVD aurthoring and as you know DVD's are at least 4.7g you can't deal with file sizes that size on FAT32. NTFS is also more stable.

    AS

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 1999
    Location
    up an ass
    Posts
    15,715
    yawn boring old debate if you work in it ntfs all the way, cant see 1 advantage that would get me to use fat fs

    peace

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Gothenburg in Sweden
    Posts
    616
    Fat32 is faster but more unstable.. anyway.. for a normal user.. dosn't matter !

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    4,348
    got linux..?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •