Results 1 to 21 of 21

Thread: Great HGH Article

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Deep south
    Posts
    896

    Great HGH Article

    This has some really good info in it.

    http://www.futurescience.com/hgh.html

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    1,371
    That's a really good article. I was suprised to read that women require a higher dose than men to acheive the same results.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Deep south
    Posts
    896
    Yes it was very good info. I like how he states "The US govt is more concerned with athletes cheating than keeping people out of nursing homes"! Its so true though! I have read that about females needing more HGH than men to get the desired effects but haven't seen the information in detail about the interaction with Estrogen.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    USA and many other places
    Posts
    11,408
    I have studied this a lot....and from what I have learned: females need LESS hgh since we have so many other hormones at play...especially if HGH is combined with BHRT

    while it is true that HGH yields better fat burning results for men more than women, according to Dr. Uzzi Reiss , he still recommends lower doses for women...
    Plus.... Dr Theirry Hertoghe, longtime anti-aging hgh doctor, recommends lower doses for women....

    (and I bet (IMO) a big reason for this is to prevent horrible bloating! hence staying at a lower dose.)
    Last edited by SlimmerMe; 10-05-2010 at 10:32 AM.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Back from Afghanistan
    Posts
    27,376
    Quote Originally Posted by SlimmerMe View Post
    I have studied this a lot....and from what I have learned: females need LESS hgh since we have so many other hormones at play...especially if HGH is combined with BHRT

    while it is true that HGH yields better fat burning results for men more than women, according to Dr. Uzzi Reiss , he still recommends lower doses for women...
    Plus.... Dr Theirry Hertoghe, longtime anti-aging hgh doctor, recommends lower doses for women....

    (and I bet (IMO) a big reason for this is to prevent horrible bloating! hence staying at a lower dose.)
    here is the excerpt from LEF OP was referring to...
    "HGH requires a somewhat larger dose in women to achieve the same effectiveness as in men. Exactly why this is true is not well understood. It is known that taking oral estrogen cuts the effectiveness of HGH in half as compared with transdermal estrogen. Women taking oral estrogen should consider switching to patches or gels. On the other hand, supplementary estradiol (a common natural estrogen) is known to greatly enhance the natural release of HGH, as well as the release of HGH in response to pharmaceutical HGH releasers such as GHRP-2 and hexarelin"

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    In the prone
    Posts
    3,578
    What is a recommended starting dose for a male, like what dose do most beginners use

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    USA and many other places
    Posts
    11,408
    re: TIMES ROMAN: so---we agree actually....thanks...I actually did read this part from LEF OP plus I already had this article bookmarked...just wanted to make sure that it was clear that women should not try a higher dose...that's all....because I feel a lot of women are lurking over the shoulders of many men here and I did not want any misunderstanding which could lead to a female taking a higher dose than her BB/anti-aging male friend...all in the name of needing a higher dose....so thanks!

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    USA and many other places
    Posts
    11,408
    Quote Originally Posted by RangersLTW View Post
    What is a recommended starting dose for a male, like what dose do most beginners use
    anywhere from 1.5 to 3...usually 2 is a great starting point....depends on goals too

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    In the prone
    Posts
    3,578
    I'm somewhat of a novice... I have done two cycles
    my next one is teste, deca and dbol, I keep reading about the HGH, and my guy can now get it....can it be ran at really low doses safely for cutting purposes or is standard gear just as effiecent for less money...This cycle is going to 16 weeks....but most I have read stats that people run HGH for six months, so is that just entirely by itself or are they running a maintance dose of test

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    USA and many other places
    Posts
    11,408
    Quote Originally Posted by RangersLTW View Post
    I'm somewhat of a novice... I have done two cycles
    my next one is teste, deca and dbol, I keep reading about the HGH, and my guy can now get it....can it be ran at really low doses safely for cutting purposes or is standard gear just as effiecent for less money...This cycle is going to 16 weeks....but most I have read stats that people run HGH for six months, so is that just entirely by itself or are they running a maintance dose of test
    run hgh for at least 6 months...for the other info, I do not know...

    I do think test is preferred by many here along with hgh...but....why not start a thread and get more personal info/advice for your specific needs?
    Last edited by SlimmerMe; 10-05-2010 at 10:54 AM.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    In the prone
    Posts
    3,578
    2iu spaced out in what time frame everyday?

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    USA and many other places
    Posts
    11,408
    ^^^^ 2 units ED....early AM pin preferred to blunt cortisol...no eating for an hour especially carbs...

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    In the prone
    Posts
    3,578
    oh ok thanks always good to learn....still not sure if the money wieghs out the benefits...do you have to be on cycle to run HGH or can it be used stand alone....Thanks SlimmerMe

  14. #14
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Back from Afghanistan
    Posts
    27,376
    Quote Originally Posted by SlimmerMe View Post
    re: TIMES ROMAN: so---we agree actually....thanks...I actually did read this part from LEF OP plus I already had this article bookmarked...just wanted to make sure that it was clear that women should not try a higher dose...that's all....because I feel a lot of women are lurking over the shoulders of many men here and I did not want any misunderstanding which could lead to a female taking a higher dose than her BB/anti-aging male friend...all in the name of needing a higher dose....so thanks!
    I'll have to go get my reading glasses.... I read it the other way.... women need to take more to acheive the same effectiveness as men.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    USA and many other places
    Posts
    11,408
    Quote Originally Posted by RangersLTW View Post
    oh ok thanks always good to learn....still not sure if the money wieghs out the benefits...do you have to be on cycle to run HGH or can it be used stand alone....Thanks SlimmerMe
    YOU are welcome!! either way.....I think for BB it is best with Test.....for anti-aging? perhaps stand alone would be okay....I just stopped my test since I was getting too big....so time will tell....

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    USA and many other places
    Posts
    11,408
    Quote Originally Posted by Times Roman View Post
    I'll have to go get my reading glasses.... I read it the other way.... women need to take more to acheive the same effectiveness as men.
    it does contradict....I think the bottom line is: as long as taken with other hormones less dosage is needed
    ...I think in between as in: no hormones or no hormone support...then perhaps higher doses would be needed....does this make more sense?

  17. #17
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Back from Afghanistan
    Posts
    27,376
    either way, the article seems to be ambigous on reread.

    If I were to just take a stab at it, I would guess women need less IU than men, but that is from a very naive position that the dose is based on a per pound basis.

    So you take test AND HGH?

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    california
    Posts
    4,136
    My understanding is that women need a higher dosage for the positive effects, but can be affected by the negative ones at a lower dosage. The reason for building up to a higher dose and not starting high.

  19. #19
    The standard GH blood concentration for men and women, based on age, is about on par with each other. I wouldn't be surprised if women require as much HGH as men.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Detriot
    Posts
    2,289
    Good article .

    Just reaffirms reason I want to use HGH .

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    USA and many other places
    Posts
    11,408
    Quote Originally Posted by Times Roman View Post
    either way, the article seems to be ambigous on reread.

    If I were to just take a stab at it, I would guess women need less IU than men, but that is from a very naive position that the dose is based on a per pound basis.

    So you take test AND HGH?
    yes...both...but going cold turkey soon....on both!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •