Im just wondering because a friend of a friend is gonna do tren acetate, however hes under the impression its harmless to your hair (this guy has very thin hair as it is, and is possibly prone to mpb because he thinks he lost hair doing dbol, which is why hes using this 'hair friendly' aas) because of the fact its a dht derivative and doesnt convert to dht. iv pointed out the fact that its so androgenic is a factor, but im pretty sure that dht derived steroids cause significant damage to hair aswel (ie. primo). Its the same for anadrol to isnt it? does the fact its already derived from dht, but doesnt convert to dht mean that dht damage isnt a concern?
Anyway, id like to be able to explain to him exactly why it could cause him hairloss due to the fact its a dht derivative that doesnt convert to dht, so does anyone know the actual reason for this? Thanks