Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: new fat burner

  1. 10-13-2005, 03:00 PM #1
    Anaholic's Avatar
    Anaholic
    Anaholic is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    240

    new fat burner

    Hey guys I've just read about a new fat burner called cimaterol. Has anyone tried it yet? Any results? what do you rate it?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 10-13-2005, 03:27 PM #2
    taylor26's Avatar
    taylor26
    taylor26 is offline Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    GYM
    Posts
    574
    looks like its pretty new round these parts I've never even heard of it. Bump!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 10-13-2005, 03:36 PM #3
    Hooksetter's Avatar
    Hooksetter
    Hooksetter is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    126
    New heard of it.....
    Last edited by Hooksetter; 10-14-2005 at 11:41 AM.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 10-13-2005, 03:37 PM #4
    taylor26's Avatar
    taylor26
    taylor26 is offline Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    GYM
    Posts
    574
    Quote Originally Posted by Hooksetter
    New heard or it.....
    what?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. 10-13-2005, 09:05 PM #5
    elite2kr
    elite2kr is offline Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    666
    looks like a good product, but getting ahold of it would be very tough,

    it seems to be very anabolic if enough protein is comsumed with it.
    Last edited by elite2kr; 10-13-2005 at 09:07 PM.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. 10-13-2005, 09:24 PM #6
    james21's Avatar
    james21
    james21 is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    SOUTH
    Posts
    2,318
    It is definately not new at all
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  7. 10-14-2005, 11:42 AM #7
    Hooksetter's Avatar
    Hooksetter
    Hooksetter is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    126
    Quote Originally Posted by james21
    It is definately not new at all
    Damn im really surprised i havent heard of it if its not new.....Is it worth a damn?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  8. 10-14-2005, 12:28 PM #8
    macrophage69alpha
    macrophage69alpha is offline VET
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Posts
    1,665
    Quote Originally Posted by james21
    It is definately not new at all
    this is correct.

    it has been around for over a decade. Its a overhyped beta-3 agonist that never delivered. Its now being "re-cycled", as supplements often are, since most people have forgotten.

    much the way that kynoselen is being pushed again, when its clearly been shown to be inneffective
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  9. 10-14-2005, 10:43 PM #9
    elite2kr
    elite2kr is offline Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    666
    Quote Originally Posted by macrophage69alpha
    this is correct.

    it has been around for over a decade. Its a overhyped beta-3 agonist that never delivered. Its now being "re-cycled", as supplements often are, since most people have forgotten.

    much the way that kynoselen is being pushed again, when its clearly been shown to be inneffective

    So would running clen alone be anabolic?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  10. 10-14-2005, 10:46 PM #10
    james21's Avatar
    james21
    james21 is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    SOUTH
    Posts
    2,318
    Quote Originally Posted by elite2kr
    So would running clen alone be anabolic?

    no...
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  11. 10-14-2005, 10:47 PM #11
    elite2kr
    elite2kr is offline Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    666
    Quote Originally Posted by james21
    no...
    even if you have never used steriods lol...
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  12. 10-14-2005, 10:50 PM #12
    james21's Avatar
    james21
    james21 is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    SOUTH
    Posts
    2,318
    In rats i believe it shows to be anabolic but in humans it isn't .
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  13. 10-14-2005, 11:10 PM #13
    Seattle Junk's Avatar
    Seattle Junk
    Seattle Junk is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Sea-town (upper left USA)
    Posts
    3,004
    Quote Originally Posted by james21
    In rats i believe it shows to be anabolic but in humans it isn't .
    I have rat genes.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules