would u rather do:EQ 500mg/wk for 12 wk or 400mg/wk for 15 wk

[operationgetbig]

i've read a lotta threads on EQ and most people seem to think that it should be run for no less than 12 weeks. in your opinion what would be more beneficial: 1) EQ at 500mg/wk for 12 weeks or 2) EQ at 400mg/wk for 15 weeks.

right now i only have enough EQ to run it like in the examples above. And i know alot of you are prolly gonna say to bump it up to 600mg. But since it could take up to 8 weeks to kick in, would running it at a mild dose like 400mg/wk for 15 weeks be more worthwile then 500mg/wk for 12 weeks. I was planning on running a cycle like this:

wk1-14: 700mg/wk test c
wk1-12: 500mg/wk eq
proper pct
OR
wk1-16: 600mg/wk test c
wk1-15: 400mg/wk EQ

If you had to choose which cycle would u rather do?

cycle hist
cycle 1
wk1-8: test e 400mg/wk

cycle 2
wk1-14: 500mg/wk sus
wk1-8: 300mg/wk deca

[GHO5T]

IMO EQ is a weak AAS, i wouldnt run any cycle containing EQ. What are your goals for the cycle bro, IMO you can substitute and replace the EQ with another compound.

[donberry427]

if you know what we are goign to tell you then why not get the correct amount of gear or sell what you have so you can afford something worth takeing?

[operationgetbig]

IMO EQ is a weak AAS, i wouldnt run any cycle containing EQ. What are your goals for the cycle bro, IMO you can substitute and replace the EQ with another compound.

i think it's too late for me to substitute it with something else. i already have it. When i first joined this forum people loved EQ. now it seems like every says dont bother. i think im definately gonna give it a try and see how my body reacts to it. im short a bottle to run it at 600mg/wk. im jus looking to see if people think a cycle at 500mg/wk for 12 weeks or 400mg/wk for 15 weeks would still be beneficial. Or if i absolutely have to get more gear cause i dont have enough. and that doing 4 or 500 is a complete waste. any other opinions?

[djack99587]

get more eq and bump it up

[operationgetbig]

if you know what we are goign to tell you then why not get the correct amount of gear or sell what you have so you can afford something worth takeing?

i just wanted to know if running EQ at a milder dosage for a longer time would be better then running it at a slightly higher dosage for a shorter period.

[SMAN12b]

I think you are gonna see about the same results whether you do the 400 for 15 or the 500 for 12. Most studies I have seen state there is a significant jump in results from 400 to 600 so I don't think it will make a difference for you.

[donberry427]

I think you are gonna see about the same results whether you do the 400 for 15 or the 500 for 12. Most studies I have seen state there is a significant jump in results from 400 to 600 so I don't think it will make a difference for you.

I agree.

[outlawtas]

uhhhhh what's your cycle history? To say 400mg/wk isn't enough without know his age/stats/cycle history is pointless. What are the goals of your cycle?

Also, many people love EQ, because some don't doesn't mean it's a bad steroid at all. Hell, some people won't even take test! (and they still make great gains). At the end of the day, we all react differently to steroids, so choose what works for you. Unfortunately that's through trial and error.

[operationgetbig]

uhhhhh what's your cycle history? To say 400mg/wk isn't enough without know his age/stats/cycle history is pointless. What are the goals of your cycle?

Also, many people love EQ, because some don't doesn't mean it's a bad steroid at all. Hell, some people won't even take test! (and they still make great gains). At the end of the day, we all react differently to steroids, so choose what works for you. Unfortunately that's through trial and error.

i put my cycle history in the first post.
age: 22
height: 5'9
weight: 205lbs
bf%: 15%

[odix]

400 for 15, i dont see a big difference in 100mg, especially from 400 to 500, my advice would be to run 600mg for 12.