Israel Fires On Lebanese Army Across Border

[ecivon]

Israel Fires On Lebanese Army Across Border:

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/823212.html

[singern]

Its interesting how you rewrote the title of the story.
Especially since the link states clearly that Lebanon shot first, and it ended after an exchange of fire.

Nope no agenda there.....................

[ecivon]

Its interesting how you rewrote the title of the story.
Especially since the link states clearly that Lebanon shot first, and it ended after an exchange of fire.

Nope no agenda there.....................

Here is the where I found the news link:

http://www.antiwar.com/

Scroll down the menus on the right side to 'Lebanon' under the photo of Watada and see for yourself what it says: Israel Shells Lebanese Army Positions Across Border, Injures Five

Click on the link and it is the Haaretz news story.

[singern]

http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exer...E04B360164.htm

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,250799,00.html

http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/meast/...non/index.html

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/6340777.stm

Interesting because every news site I have seen says clearly that Israel returned fire. After being shot at while searching for roadside explosives.

[ecivon]

http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exer...E04B360164.htm

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,250799,00.html

http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/meast/...non/index.html

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/6340777.stm

Interesting because every news site I have seen says clearly that Israel returned fire. After being shot at while searching for roadside explosives.

Are you still challenging me, or did you follow the links I provided?

[singern]

Are you still challenging me, or did you follow the links I provided?

Challenge is a good thing, discussing opposing view points, and opinions is why we are here.

I did follow the link you sent. But if I have to choose the lesser of two evils being syndicated International news organizations, or an anti-war website ...........the choice is for me is clear.

[ecivon]

Challenge is a good thing, discussing opposing view points, and opinions is why we are here.

I did follow the link you sent. But if I have to choose the lesser of two evils being syndicated International news organizations, or an anti-war website ...........the choice is for me is clear.

No Bro, the issue here is that you accused me of intentionally altering the news headline, not the validity/credibility of the news source. As long as you know ...

[juicedOUTbrain]

Challenge is a good thing, discussing opposing view points, and opinions is why we are here.

I did follow the link you sent. But if I have to choose the lesser of two evils being syndicated International news organizations, or an anti-war website ...........the choice is for me is clear.

Who cares who invaded who? The latest attack is always a retaliation from the one before it...this has been going on forever, and its not until someone breaks the cycle that this can happen...this has no chance because israel is asking for peace while occupying others land...including shibba farms...

[ecivon]

Who cares who invaded who? The latest attack is always a retaliation from the one before it...this has been going on forever, and its not until someone breaks the cycle that this can happen...this has no chance because israel is asking for peace while occupying others land...including shibba farms...

Nuff said ... guess it's not just me.

[singern]

No Bro, the issue here is that you accused me of intentionally altering the news headline, not the validity/credibility of the news source. As long as you know ...

And that still stands.
The link you posted points to a Haarets news article clearly stating the opposite of your thread title. The inner link to antiwar.com was never mentioned in your original post....

[Israel Fires On Lebanese Army Across Border:

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/823212.html]



And since neither of us was actually there when it happened, credibility and validity of the actual facts is up for grabs, I just lean in favor of legitimate international news sites vs an antiwar site when it comes down to it. thats my choice.

[ecivon]

And that still stands.
The link you posted points to a Haarets news article clearly stating the opposite of your thread title. The inner link to antiwar.com was never mentioned in your original post....

[Israel Fires On Lebanese Army Across Border:

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/823212.html]



And since neither of us was actually there when it happened, credibility and validity of the actual facts is up for grabs, I just lean in favor of legitimate international news sites vs an antiwar site when it comes down to it. thats my choice.

You seem to think that you can come on here and post all the threads you want and post all the replies you want denigrating arabs, muslims, all other ME countries, all tainted with racial innuendo and elitism, carte blanche and when someone posts comments contrary to your opinion(s) you go off. Why is that?

[singern]

You seem to think that you can come on here and post all the threads you want and post all the replies you want denigrating arabs, muslims, all other ME countries, all tainted with racial innuendo and elitism, carte blanche and when someone posts comments contrary to your opinion(s) you go off. Why is that?

Who did I denigrate, where and when did I "go off" , Why cant I post my opinions, and what does this have to do with the topic?