Results 1 to 32 of 32

Thread: 6% bf? or low?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    126

    6% bf? or low?

    Hi,
    He's not a member yet, but a training mate in my gym... I'm trying to figure out what %bf he reached in ago 2006.

    6% or less?
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	putovictor.jpg 
Views:	5299 
Size:	32.9 KB 
ID:	78032  
    Last edited by assguy22; 02-03-2007 at 03:59 AM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Asia
    Posts
    12,114
    I am with you 6% or less. Lucky prick he looks awesome !!!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Rising from my Ashes !!
    Posts
    9,717
    agree with Kale. he is pretty cut so 6 or less

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Posts
    7,379
    Jesus look at the indententations between his muscles, that's nuts!

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    ninja dojo, UK
    Posts
    4,082
    my guess is lower than 6%. whatever the case, he looks fooking awesome. i can almost see what he had for lunch!

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    216
    Yeah he looks good. I'd say closer to 5%

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Act as if...
    Posts
    765
    hard to tell without front pics.. but mofo looks damn good, full complete build in the back.. wonder what his diet looks like?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    gettin lucky in kentucky
    Posts
    1,729
    i just had mine checked a couple weeks ago which was 6% and that guy has got to be under that. prolly 5%.

  9. #9
    number twelve's Avatar
    number twelve is offline All Natty...Kinda~Winning Member Transformation Contest!
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    3,968
    his shoulders...holy sh*t

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Mountaineer Country
    Posts
    1,592
    He looks like an anatomy poster. Damn that is impressive.

  11. #11
    5/6...shit..

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    n. california
    Posts
    809
    Great Photo!

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Houston
    Posts
    639
    Holy shit under 6

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Houston
    Posts
    639
    great back!

  15. #15
    I know everyone already said under 6...but yeah I agree. Just wanted to say DAMN!!!

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Hong Kong. /Expat
    Posts
    20
    Thats awsome

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Egypt
    Posts
    277
    Extensively awesome.... Nice work!

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    390
    Definitely under 6%.

    Very nice back !

    Cheers

  19. #19
    shit i look like that on a bad day i wish my back was like that

  20. #20
    <6....crazyyyyy cut ...wow!!

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    305
    WoW sick back im going w/ less then 6%

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    164
    im going with 3% i know flex wheeler at the 93 olympia was rediculous and they said he had 0.0 on a skin fold caliper...dunno if thats true. This dude looks about as low though. everything is perfectly defined like flex, probably more than lot of bodybuilders on stage. he just obviously isnt as big and his muscles are glycogen loaded im sure. freakin crazy definition though.

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,039
    Shredded!

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,147
    It's all good, of note for me was the awesome delt inserts to the arms.

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    453
    Nice Dude very nice

  26. #26
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Barbados
    Posts
    16,240
    I'd have to see his glutes and hams to say ...but 6% isn't a bad guess based on what i can see.

    Some guys (like me) have female fat distribution patterns.

    So my back would be shredded like that..but my glutes and hams still 'soft'.

  27. #27
    Quote Originally Posted by thekaydense
    im going with 3% i know flex wheeler at the 93 olympia was rediculous and they said he had 0.0 on a skin fold caliper...dunno if thats true. This dude looks about as low though. everything is perfectly defined like flex, probably more than lot of bodybuilders on stage. he just obviously isnt as big and his muscles are glycogen loaded im sure. freakin crazy definition though.
    when your bodyfat gets low enough...skin folds are pretty difficult to determine bodyfat..I can assure you he wasnt 0% lol

  28. #28
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    164
    Quote Originally Posted by chest6
    when your bodyfat gets low enough...skin folds are pretty difficult to determine bodyfat..I can assure you he wasnt 0% lol
    lol i know. you have to have at least 2.5 % i think surrounding your organs to even survive. but subcutaneous fat i bet it was close. i saw a video and he was 2.6 or something crazy a few weeks out. then after the diuretics i bet it was pure skin.

  29. #29
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    sydney, australia
    Posts
    3,512
    i can honstly say i'm jelous lol... your lucky to train with him... good motivation IMO!

  30. #30
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Mass
    Posts
    2,509
    wow thats amazing. and pretty much thats my goal. i would say hes about 4.5-5%

  31. #31
    Holy shit....that like made my jaw drop

  32. #32
    nice work 5% easy

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •