Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: Me at the beginning of my first cycle

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    In my house
    Posts
    686

    Me at the beginning of my first cycle

    Here I am at the beginning of my first cycle. The tape says 5' 11", the calipers say 10% and the scale says 201. I'm a week and a half into a frontloaded test e cycle. 500MG twice on the first week and then 250MG twice a week after that. I'll try to throw some pics in here periodically. So this is me, with all my gains still 100% natural. I can't pose for $hit and for some reason I look way better in the mirror than I do in photos. Kind of weird, but here they are anyway. I used to be really fat, so no making fun of my loose skin and stretch marks!
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	p8230005.jpg 
Views:	437 
Size:	242.6 KB 
ID:	84391   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	p8230017.jpg 
Views:	339 
Size:	192.1 KB 
ID:	84392   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	p8230009.jpg 
Views:	284 
Size:	200.6 KB 
ID:	84393   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	p8230011.jpg 
Views:	183 
Size:	154.7 KB 
ID:	84394   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	p8230020.jpg 
Views:	359 
Size:	112.0 KB 
ID:	84395  


  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    In my house
    Posts
    686
    Here's one more. I got fairly veiny after my last cut.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	p8230025.jpg 
Views:	309 
Size:	91.3 KB 
ID:	84396  

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    1,112
    Well first of: Looking solid, lot of muscle.
    Second of: You are not even close to 10. More like 16% +

  4. #4
    number twelve's Avatar
    number twelve is offline All Natty...Kinda~Winning Member Transformation Contest!
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    3,968
    agree with van. you look good tho bro

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    the true north
    Posts
    1,881
    nice work getting to 200+, but your calipers are broke.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    The 50 States
    Posts
    2,555
    good size. bf is not 10%. still wanna see the front witout the tank on.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    In my house
    Posts
    686
    Well, calipers aren't always accurate. I'll know for sure next time I cut. Plus my skin will be tighter after this bulk so that will make it easier. I'll know the look I want when I get there.
    By the way, I was 255 at 48% (used wrist/waist measurement calculator) when I started the whole bodybuilding thing.
    I want to get another 20 pounds of muscle and look ripped, but not contest shape, 7% maybe. So this and another cycle should hopefully do the trick.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    In my house
    Posts
    686
    I don't think you want to see that. My skin is kind of loose, so you can see abs just a little on the top, but there is a small fat deposit at the bottom. Plus some stretch marks you wouldn't believe.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    the dirty
    Posts
    907
    Quote Originally Posted by sonnygll
    Well, calipers aren't always accurate. I'll know for sure next time I cut. Plus my skin will be tighter after this bulk so that will make it easier. I'll know the look I want when I get there.
    By the way, I was 255 at 48% (used wrist/waist measurement calculator) when I started the whole bodybuilding thing.
    I want to get another 20 pounds of muscle and look ripped, but not contest shape, 7% maybe. So this and another cycle should hopefully do the trick.

    you look good. nice start. 7% is ridiculously shredded dude.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    VA
    Posts
    805
    good base, 10% not a chance, you will get there tho, keep it up

  11. #11
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    In my house
    Posts
    686
    Well maybe 7% isn't what I'm thinking it is. See, I thought 9% was when your abs are just starting to show.

    Here is a guide where this guy shows pictures of his progress. I was thinking something along the lines of how he looks in the 7% picture on page 2. as far as bodyfat anyway. Not size obviously.
    http://www.naturalphysiques.com/cms/...php?itemid=144
    Are his numbers a little low maybe? Maybe the goal I have in mind is higher?

    I really don't know how much to pinch. I should probably find someone else to do it. Or maybe I should just forget about it, and when I do my next cut just go until it looks the way I want it.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    At home
    Posts
    245
    Quote Originally Posted by sonnygll
    By the way, I was 255 at 48% (used wrist/waist measurement calculator) when I started the whole bodybuilding thing.trick.
    48% fat ?
    I think you calculated wrong... You'd be super obese if you were at 48% before.
    You will probably have to weigh 500lbs+ to be 48% and 5'11

  13. #13
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    In my house
    Posts
    686
    I weighed 255 with a lean mass of 133, that means I had 122 pounds of fat. At 255 that's just shy of 48%. 122 is 47.84% of 255. I could barley fit into 46" waist pants.

    Now granted I was pretty atrophied from being a couch potato, and some past dieting. I had been like 225 with a normal lean mass. I lost weight from just diet and a little cardio. I got down to 168, but I had lost a lot of muscle. So I still had a gut and man boobs, but I looked really thin and sickly. I wanted to lose more weight cuz I had a gut, but people were telling me I looked like I had lost too much.

    So then I was back to eating whatever and that didn't put much muscle back on me because I was a couch potato. So I still had lower than normal lean mass when I got fat again. So then I found out my blood levels were not what they should be, so I had another reason to educate myself and lose weight.

    So I learned a little and I started lifting weights, I tried the typical bodybuilding diets. That first year I didn't really stick with it, but I still put on some muscle, and lost fat. The end of that year I was slacking off, I kept almost all the muscle because it was really muscle I had before my improper dieting. But I gained most of the fat back. I was up to 268, but bodyfat around 44 to 45%. That's when I discovered my insulin resistance. I had also learned more about diet and training and figured out how to make it work better for my body. I got more serious too.

    That was early summer 2004, when I finally got serious. By end of that year, I was more than just serious about fitness. I had really gotten interested in bodybuilding and spent countless hours learning about. I had an easy job for a while where I could spend most of the day learning about it. Then hit the gym hard.

    So I went from barley fitting into 46" pants then, to fitting into 36" now. I could wear 34", but my legs are too big. Plus my abs are bigger now.

    There are people who are many times fatter than that too. I know it seems hard to believe, but a lot of your typical obese people in modern western countries are over 50%. It doesn't seem like people could be more then half fat, but they are.

    So anyway, that's how I got like that and then got back into shape and healthy again and then got into bodybuilding. Of course as a kid I was a big Incredible Hulk fan, and later a big fan of all the Arnold movies. So I think I was destined to get into bodybuilding at some point.

    So in short, yes, it had to be close to that.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    VA
    Posts
    805
    after all that said, thats awesome man. Keep up the good work. You should be an inspiration to fat people worldwide.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    In my house
    Posts
    686
    Just to illustrate it. The first picture is me almost at my worst, about 250, untrained and atrophied from yo-yo diets. The second is from early March 2006, 240 with only about 4 or 5 pounds less muscle than I have now. The 3rd pic is from 3 or 4 weeks ago, at 203. My muscle mass is the same, but I have lost 2 pounds of fat since then. So I was 1% bf higher than whatever I am now.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	untrained250.jpg 
Views:	154 
Size:	33.0 KB 
ID:	84419   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	fat240.jpg 
Views:	251 
Size:	102.6 KB 
ID:	84420   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	p8020014.jpg 
Views:	273 
Size:	230.0 KB 
ID:	84421  

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •