Okay, so if we use IGF-1 levels as a marker, for how potent any GH related compounds are, comparison becomes possible?
Ideally GH should be measured and used for comparison, but supposedly this is not possible for some reason?
Okay so we measure IGF-1 responce
Here's an exmaple:
HGH:
http://jcem.endojournals.org/cgi/content/full/86/4/1731
Supraphysiological doses of rHGH(0.15 I.U/KG/Day(For a 80-100 KG male 12-15 I.U per day approx), resulted in a doubling of IGF, or 1-fold increase.
CJC:
http://www.ibeforums.com/portal/foru...light=cjc-1295
"Various experiments have been conducted to test the effectiveness of CJC-1295 in vivo and the Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism has reported dose-dependent increases in mean plasma GH concentrations by 2-10 fold for more than 6 days and increased IGF-1 concentrations 1.5-3 fold for 9-11 days after a single injection!"
Have i made an error here or does this mean that CJC is a hell of a lot more effective than rHGH?
Reply With Quote