Of the two cycles...which would you pick if it was offered to you and why...
I have done both....at lower doses of coarse and I prefered the test/tren combo...
Of the two cycles...which would you pick if it was offered to you and why...
I have done both....at lower doses of coarse and I prefered the test/tren combo...
What you eat and how you train is more relavant than which of these cycles would put on more bulk than the other. Both look ok to me for someone fairly lean and 220+lbs. (excluding 7 foot tall of course).
I went test /deca. Id throw in some dbol and have one of my fav mass stacks. Old school maybe but i like it alot. Id prefer to extend both(test/deca) 2 more weeks. I like deca for bulking because it makes me feel so good joints etc...i can go heavy at gym comfortably and feel good ...add in dbol for strength and test as base for cycle. Im totally down. I love tren ...but i like tren a ...i know its same substance diff esther but tren e , even after kicking in, doesnt hit me near as hard as tren a. Test p / tren a / winny to cut - I LOVE it.
Never tried it .. kinda old school i guess .. methyl tren is a new one to me. Lets just say i remember when dbol only came in 5 mg / best drol was brazilian hemogenin / cyp said upjohn on the label and later on when anavar came around SPA was the only brand. Not opposed to methyl tren ...just havent tried it yet.
Doses are way too high for me. I used 500mg tren/week before, 800 scares me so I guess I'd go with the deca.
No question, TREN!!!!
For pure strength? Test and tren beats test and deca for sure at those dosages. Nevermind the bloat you get from deca, and it won't help one bit when compared to tren's strength. Tren rules fellas, everything else is secondary.
Run the test at least 2 weeks longer than the tren and you'll be cool.
tren is superior but so are it's sides. Win/lose situation
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)