Bulking with fast acting esters instead of slow? Whats the difference?

[WoD]

Hey guys, I'm starting a lean bulk cycle on moday. Cycle looks like this:

1-14 100mg Test Prop EOD
4-14 50mg Tren Ace EOD
1-14 300mg EQ EW

I personally prefer fast acting esters, like prop and tren ace over test enth and tren enth, can I still bulk with 10-15lbs of lean muscle with these compounds? I hate the bloat I get from test enanthate but people say test is test right? so why should bulking be any different if I'm using prop instead of enanthate? same thing applies to Tren ace and tren enanthate, right? or am I missing something here??

I have EQ in the cycle, because its amaaaaazing, the pumps and vascular from EQ is just insane .

[D7M]

age?
height?
weight?
bf%?
years training?
planned pct?

Sure you can bulk with either a short or long ester.

but I personally wouldn't want to pin EOD for 14 weeks,

and your EQ dose is on the low side. but if it works for you.....

[Bossman]

I only use short esters for both bulking and cutting. You'll get the same results with both short and long esters.

Your dosages are a little on the week side, how many cycles have you run?
Stats?

[seriouslifter]

I only use short esters for both bulking and cutting. You'll get the same results with both short and long esters.

Your dosages are a little on the week side, how many cycles have you run?
Stats?

how you get same results if short acting kicks in faster = better gains

[Forbidden16]

how you get same results if short acting kicks in faster = better gains

Faster ester means faster results, not better. Same amount of Enanthate and Propionate both at steady levels should yield the same results. Mg vs. Mg, Test = Test

[c-Z]

Shorter ester cycles most don't usually run it for 12-14 weeks. where as a long ester you run it longer.... Some find they gain better on short burst cycles where others gain better on long long ester cycles...