Originally Posted by
supe3
After see what most people here have to say about Anthony Roberts I have to ask:
Is the things he has written about on this site reliable?
Yes, the veracity and legitimacy of his work has never been a question.
If they are not then why are they still up for people who dont know about him to read and think they should take his advice?
Because they are both reliable and valid.
Second, did he wright all the steroid profiles found on steroid.com?
Yes, that's true. (I need to add that was true most if not all have been rewritten now and added we have a few more we are working on at this time... thanks *admin*)
most of them talk about "personal experience" and they include advice and recomendations for use. I know I when I first started reading this site almost 4 years ago I took most of what was written there to heart and thought that it was the word of god on the matter. (now days I know better, i was only like 25 then)
Actually it's an amalgam of rather sound (with regard to the attention to detail and cross-referencing of data) research and experiential information which very often coincide. And again, "yes" what you see in the profiles can (for the most part) be adhered to as if it was one of the gospels, or written by the very hand of God on Mosiac stone tablets or from the Book of Daniel on the wall of king Nebuchadnezzar.
Reply With Quote
