Results 1 to 16 of 16

Thread: Trenbolone Enanthate

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    110

    Trenbolone Enanthate

    Does anyone have any info on Trenbolone enanthate? I checked the steroid profiles and only found acetate. Thanks!

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Kitchen
    Posts
    419
    Asking a question like that will make people want to know your stats.

    Age
    Height
    Weight
    Cycle Experience ( Have you used Tren Acetate )
    Proposed Cycle

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    5,637
    Stats?

    What exactly do you want to know about it? Most of what gets said about Acetate applies Enanthate as well except the obvious which is the carbon length.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Detriot
    Posts
    2,289
    I believe it's just a difference in ester's .
    A is eod and E is 2x/week
    E is a little shy on the molecule weight I believe .
    Long ester vs short and so on

    A is recommended for first time user so if sides are bad you can stop faster .

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    110
    39, 6'2, 250. I have used tren acetate a few years back with no harsh sides. I am going to run test enanthate with possibly tren enanthate. Im still researching so im not sure about the tren just yet. Thanks bro.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    5,637
    Quote Originally Posted by Dont wanna be old View Post
    I believe it's just a difference in ester's .
    A is eod and E is 2x/week
    E is a little shy on the molecule weight I believe .
    Long ester vs short and so on

    A is recommended for first time user so if sides are bad you can stop faster .
    I wouldn't recommend Ace for a first timer. It's much more potent than Enanthate, enabling a higher risk of ill-side effects compared to Parabolan or Tren E.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    5,637
    How do I figure? Because Acetates free equivalent per 100mg is 87mg of actual steroid where as Enanthate is 72mg. The more potent, generally more side effects follow....

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Detriot
    Posts
    2,289
    Quote Originally Posted by HawaiianPride. View Post
    I wouldn't recommend Ace for a first timer. It's much more potent than Enanthate, enabling a higher risk of ill-side effects compared to Parabolan or Tren E.
    My bad .
    I thought this was the consensus of the board .
    I'm running E but started low until I saw if I could handle sides .
    But I'm a conservative cycler .

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    5,637
    Although many people (including myself) like to say Test is Test, it really doesn't matter. Well technically if one were to use Test Suspension as a first cycle, that would be a big no no. Considering Suspension is gram for gram the most potent and most powerful anabolic substance out there. Well same would apply to Acetate because it's right under Suspension, then Propionate would follow.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    110
    Thanks for the info guys i appreciate it.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Midwestern U.S.
    Posts
    449
    Quote Originally Posted by HawaiianPride. View Post
    Although many people (including myself) like to say Test is Test, it really doesn't matter. Well technically if one were to use Test Suspension as a first cycle, that would be a big no no. Considering Suspension is gram for gram the most potent and most powerful anabolic substance out there. Well same would apply to Acetate because it's right under Suspension, then Propionate would follow.
    yes but you just compensate by running a different dosage right? Like instead of running 500mgs of test cyp you could run 400mg's of prop and get an equivalent dosage of test. Right?

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    5,637
    Quote Originally Posted by wormwood View Post
    yes but you just compensate by running a different dosage right? Like instead of running 500mgs of test cyp you could run 400mg's of prop and get an equivalent dosage of test. Right?
    Of course. But I see a lot of people condoning the use of 500mg per week of Prop for novices, or a first time Tren user the Acetate ester at 500mg per week, which is just unnecessary and a bit overboard IMO. A lot of people just don't realize that there is a significant different in the esters and individuals tend to get away with the least amount of side effects with less potent compounds.

    This is why Enanthate and Cypionate are generally recommended for first timers. Usually when one wants to ride the "Tren Train" I'll try to steer them into using Parabolan or E.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    1,728
    Quote Originally Posted by HawaiianPride. View Post
    Of course. But I see a lot of people condoning the use of 500mg per week of Prop for novices, or a first time Tren user the Acetate ester at 500mg per week, which is just unnecessary and a bit overboard IMO. A lot of people just don't realize that there is a significant different in the esters and individuals tend to get away with the least amount of side effects with less potent compounds.

    This is why Enanthate and Cypionate are generally recommended for first timers. Usually when one wants to ride the "Tren Train" I'll try to steer them into using Parabolan or E.
    I been argueing this for a while. Im glad to see somerone agrees, its always recomended to run test enanth or cyp cause the long ester is easier to maintain blood levels to control sides but yet somehow tren ace is better for beginers than enath? Makes no sense at all. And it wont take two wks for sides to stop with enath either thats how long for the drug to clear completely it will gradually taper itself soo sides will go away pretty quick if you stop;.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    5,637
    Quote Originally Posted by stiflersmom;537***2
    I am not trying to make waves here but i still would say 50-75mg of acetate eod would be superior to 200-300mg of enanthate per week for a first cycle of tren simply because it could be discontinued quicker and run for a shorter period.
    No worries bro, to each their own. You are entitled to your own beliefs and what you think is right and what isn't. From my experience, I have seen more people complain less on Tren E or Parabolan rather than Acetate.

    Quote Originally Posted by gymnerd;537***5
    I been argueing this for a while. Im glad to see somerone agrees, its always recomended to run test enanth or cyp cause the long ester is easier to maintain blood levels to control sides but yet somehow tren ace is better for beginers than enath? Makes no sense at all. And it wont take two wks for sides to stop with enath either thats how long for the drug to clear completely it will gradually taper itself soo sides will go away pretty quick if you stop;.
    Completely agree.

  15. #15
    Tren Ace are much more potent than Tren E.
    I have used Tren Ace at 350mg ew, I have also used Tren E at 500mg ew...
    The Tren Ace was more potent than the Tren E at these doses.
    I love shorts esters effect but hate to pin ed :P

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    811
    anyone ever used both tren a and tren e during the same cycle because they ran out? Just wondering .....im not running out...haha..

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •