old article on esquire.com about taking AAS

[supe3]

Dont know if this is something that may have been posted before, but give it a read and leave a couple comments.

http://www.esquire.com/features/steroids-0408

[stack_it]

This dudes a joke. I believe one of our old members wrote a counter article to this but can't renember if it was published. The guy is no where near in the shape to cycle. He runs way too many compounds for a first cycle and his diet and training were prolly shit.

[smalltime7]

wow I guess he had a bad experience.....wait maybe hes just full of shit.

[cherrydrpepper]

He starts out an out of shape 208 lbs, goes up to 240 lbs, drops down to 170 lbs. Those numbers kind of speak for themselves as far as his work ethic in the gym and at the dinner table. Instead of blaming aas for his yo-yo physique he should just admit he's not willing to train hard and eat right when hes off the sauce.

[cro]

ouch ,thats scarry

[Bonaparte]

Well, he is a fiction writer after all...

[MBMETC]

test only first cycle!

[D7M]

This dudes a joke. I believe one of our old members wrote a counter article to this but can't remember if it was published.

Yah, Merc. did.

[D7M]

Yah, Merc. did.

http://forums.steroid.com/showthread...ine&highlight=

[AlphaMaleDawg]

lol @ that fat $hit. what a pathetic human being

[moregunsthanroses]

wow this guy screwed up big time with gear and he tries to blame the substance for his idiocy.

Too funny when he's on cycle he can do 100lb dumbells on bench for 10 reps but a couple months post cycle he only can do 90lb dumbells for one rep. wow that's bad, I didn't read all of it but I don't think he even took PCT.