Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: Any Difference between 500 mg of Sust per week and 500 mg of Test E?

  1. #1

    Question Any Difference between 500 mg of Sust per week and 500 mg of Test E?

    Sust 500mg a week compared to Test E 500mg a week. Does one work better than the other?? Heard mixed opinions on this? Test is Test right?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Louisiana. Source checks
    Posts
    3,467
    test is test

  3. #3
    OK thanks

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    FLORIDA
    Posts
    959
    You will be getting more actual test per week with the sustanon than you will with E or C for the first 3 or 4 weeks because of the short esters untill the E builds up in your system at equal doses.

  5. #5
    You will be getting more actual test per week with the sustanon than you will with E or C for the first 3 or 4 weeks because of the short esters untill the E builds up in your system at equal doses.


    That was cool to read
    it does make sense too

    So I guess you could do 4 weeks of sust to sort of load
    and then take what ever test you can get for a decent price after that to continue?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    FLORIDA
    Posts
    959
    Quote Originally Posted by flatland4life View Post
    You will be getting more actual test per week with the sustanon than you will with E or C for the first 3 or 4 weeks because of the short esters untill the E builds up in your system at equal doses.


    That was cool to read
    it does make sense too

    So I guess you could do 4 weeks of sust to sort of load
    and then take what ever test you can get for a decent price after that to continue?
    You could do that but i wouldn wait to start using the The long ester too late,you could start adding some E after a couple of weeks so it can build up in your system.I would just use sus for the whole cycle or E for the whole cycle. I personally like sus every 3 days 250mg,or more if you want.you get the effects quicker with sus than E. I use 500mg sus a week or 600mg E a week and the cost is about the same for me.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    The Murder Mitten
    Posts
    3,744
    I think people forget the longer the ester, the more space it takes up. You will get more actual testosterone from prop then enanthate because the enanthate ester takes up more space. So technically the sust will have a little more actual test.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    FLORIDA
    Posts
    959
    In practice, the amount used for frontloading -- the first day's injection amount -- should be that which will on average be taken in 5 days, plus the usual dosage. This total value may be rounded for convenience as exactness isn't required.

    So for example if taking 750 mg/week as three injections of 250 mg each, the average daily rate is 107 mg/day (750 mg divided by 7 days.) So the average taken in 5 days is 535 mg (107 mg/day times 5 days.) Add what will be the usual injection amount which is 250 mg, and our total is 785 mg, which I'd recommend rounding to 750 mg.

    After this, subsequent injections are all 250 mg.

    This procedure will give proper blood levels much more rapidly than is the case when failing to frontload.

    As to dosage, there are many ways to look at it, but a fairly simple and useful one is to categorize usage at increments of 250 mg/week.

    Usage of 250 mg/week usually amounts to nothing other than high-end testosterone repla***ent therapy. There is no guarantee that this usage will even cause testosterone levels to exceed the normal range. The dosing is high enough to suppress LH production, but in most cases is not high enough for any striking anabolic or fat-loss effects. Depending on individual sensitivity, this amount may be high enough to cause gynecomastia if an aromatase inhibitor is not used, or may be enough to cause oily skin or acne. In a few instances, anabolic or fat loss benefits may be impressive, as there are individuals who are high responders. But this isn't the usual outcome for this dosage level.

    500 mg/week. In my opinion, this is a reasonable minimum for an actual steroid cycle. I see little point in suppressing the HPTA but probably failing to get much gains out of it, as is the usual outcome for any dosage much less than this. Again, because testosterone aromatizes to estradiol, an aromatase inhibitor may be required to avoid estrogen-related problems. No one, I think, will fail to see substantially improved gains at this dosage level compared to natural training, but the rate of improvement may be slow. Eight weeks, however, is sufficient even at this amount for a quite significant improvement, unless of course one has trained for enough time at this usage level to have gotten most of what the individual can obtain from it.

    750 mg/week. I would rather see this amount used if choosing to do a cycle. If an aromatase inhibitor is used it is unlikely that increased side effects would be a real reason to prefer 500 mg/weeek over this dosage, and results are very substantially superior.


    'Testosterone propionate', 'testosterone phenylpropionate', 'testosterone isocaproate', and 'testosterone decanoate' are the chemical names of the active ingredients in Sustanon 250. Sustenon 250 and Sostenon 250 are registered trademarks of Organon Corporation in the United States and/or other countries.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    13,506
    ^^^ How much of that was copied from another source?
    Because it amounts to plagiarism (and douche-bagerry) to not put it in quotes and try to cite the author.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    No Sources Given
    Posts
    5,408
    Yeah but then you don't look nearly so studious....

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    lone star state
    Posts
    1,425
    Quote Originally Posted by Bonaparte View Post
    ^^^ How much of that was copied from another source?
    Because it amounts to plagiarism (and douche-bagerry) to not put it in quotes and try to cite the author.
    Douche-bagerry? Is that a word? I like it Bonapart. Lol

  12. #12
    dec11's Avatar
    dec11 is offline 'everything louder than everything else'
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    *no sources i wont reply*
    Posts
    14,140
    Quote Originally Posted by Bonaparte View Post
    ^^^ How much of that was copied from another source?
    Because it amounts to plagiarism (and douche-bagerry) to not put it in quotes and try to cite the author.
    and whoever originally wrote it cant even spell the brand names, prob off some other inferior forum

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    13,506
    Quote Originally Posted by gymfu View Post
    Douche-bagerry? Is that a word? I like it Bonapart. Lol
    Not yet, but I'm hoping it will catch on. Wish me luck!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •