Whats more harsh, total dosage or # of compounds equalling a dosage?

[Knockout_Power]

Couple of the boys and I were having a discussion, not really sure how it started, but it came down to which is more harmful to the body...

a) a high dosage of a single compound (lets use test and at a dose of 1g+/week)

or

b) a combination of more than 1 compound equalling the above dose


*** example

200mg/day test (1400mg/week)

vs

500/wk test, 500/wk deca and 400/wk of say Masteron


One argument came from a Test only user saying that we naturally have test, so learning to understand higher doses was the way to go. Most of the guys agreed that lower doses of multiple compounds, even though adding up to the same amount of gear, was easier on the body.

I was kind of on the fence with this one cause I figured there were way too many variables such as

- the Anti-E and Anti-P's that would have to be used
- what are these "multiple" compounds, if you include something like tren or a harsh oral, does that factor in any way
- individual tolerance to AAS
- how high are we willing to take each comparison to see the results (eg. 3g of test vs 3g of various gear)

and so on...

I know we have a ton of guys on here with loads of experience with test as well as multi-compund cycles, so I would like to hear peoples inputs.

thoughts?

[The Bear 79]

I'd hav 2 say the inclusion of a 19 nor would def make the overall dose "mor harsh" IMO. I dont think the side effects of 1400 mg/wk of Test would b as bad as the sides u would get from say 700 Test & 700 Deca or Tren.

[Bonaparte]

Poor example, as test isn't toxic. But yeah, there are way too many variables. You really just have to look at what the compound(s) do to your bp, lipids, liver enzymes, etc.