Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: NORMA DECA supposibly are said to be for humans, any truth to that?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    CROOKLYN N.Y.
    Posts
    41

    NORMA DECA supposibly are said to be for humans, any truth to that?

    any truth to that?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    5,163
    yes

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    CROOKLYN N.Y.
    Posts
    41
    thanks..

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    282
    supposedly

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    not where I want to be
    Posts
    6,696
    not much difference in vet and human gear. only conditions in the lab.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    93
    I like it. Went 8 weeks with Norma hellas, 8 weeks sustanon 250 and 5 weeks d bol 28 lb gain. No a lot of water.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    under some plywood sheets
    Posts
    2,229
    Originally posted by symatech
    not much difference in vet and human gear. only conditions in the lab.
    a big difference for me

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    mass
    Posts
    647
    Originally posted by TRLS63


    a big difference for me
    How do you know there is a difference between human and vet gear besides sterility? Possible under filling/underdosing can happen in either. Do youi have any studies or research? Mabey your traing, diet, rest, etc were off on a cycle, and you got less gains. Deca was a drug designed for human use. I know all the vet companies produce it too, though.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •