20 weeks

[noon]

Is twenty weeks to long to run a test only cycle.
Sus 250 twice a week.

[Lunk1]

Comes down to cost vs benifit..after 12-14 weeks the benifits decrees and the sides can increase

[austinite]

I'd be very careful doing this. You'd need a very aggressive PCT that will hopefully work. But really what is your goal here? Maybe 20 weeks is not needed.

[noon]

Funny you should ask bout my goals
I was aiming at a dry 190 lbs I'm only 5'7
But I reached that goal with mostly sound diet and hard work
now I'm curious what I would look like at 205 I am currently running sust 250
Twice a week. with tamo /nolva and daa for my pct

[JohnnnyBlazzze]

Personally that is a long duration for somebody to be shutdown IMO. Remember the longer you are shutdown, the longer and more aggressive you will need to be in recovering!

[austinite]

15 lbs? You can do that in 12 weeks.

[noon]

Lol no I dought it
it will take time to build up to it but I recover from my work outs
quickly while running test .
I'm not in a race. slow and steady

[noon]

My cycle now will end at 14 WEEKS

[Bio-Active]

good choice

[austinite]

good choice

Agree.

[dec11]

20wks is cruising, not cycling.

14wks is still too long, go 12wks max.

[noon]

Thanks

[noon]

I wa thinking of doing another simple cycle over the winter possibly cyp

[dec11]

I wa thinking of doing another simple cycle over the winter possibly cyp

you wont have the space to run the sust cycle plus another cycle within the winter season

[noon]

I finish this cycle next week

[Lunk1]

I would call it a spring cycle cause your looking at March now

[poppz]

i did 16 wks ,sus deca ,proper pct ,fine now,,i did notice gains slowin down around that time.

[marcus300]

Ive ran loads of long cycles but never liked them especially when you put them against shorter ones (4-8 wks), I can run a shorter cycle with alot less sides and far better gains.

Yes 20 weeks is to much unless your prepping for a contest

[Nicotine]

even if your cycle is only 14 weeks, what do you have planned for post cycle therapy?

[austinite]

^ good question.

[binsser]

is it too long because if u run primo its 16 weeks min and youve got to run test with it as well ????

[Sworder]

Ive ran loads of long cycles but never liked them especially when you put them against shorter ones (4-8 wks), I can run a shorter cycle with alot less sides and far better gains.

Insightful!

[austinite]

is it too long because if u run primo its 16 weeks min and youve got to run test with it as well ????

Primo/Test cycle would also apply here. I wouldn't recommend it for anyone that is not both experienced and a TRT patient. At the end of the cycle... it's all about recovery, and these super extended cycles certainly dont make it easy.

[binsser]

people do say 20 weeks min with primo though?? but yeah i see what your saying short blast cycles are safer!!

[Metalject]

It all depends on your goals. If you're wanting to be a serious competitor you're going to be on cycle for long periods of time...far more so than not. Yes, there's a tradeoff when it comes to risk but that's decision only you can make.

Also, another thought, is 20wks really going to make a huge difference compared to a standard 14-16wk test cycle,,,and I'm referring to both benefits and recovery. No, probably won't make a huge difference in either case.