Results 1 to 29 of 29

Thread: When should one consider doing a TREN Cycle

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    GuidoTown
    Posts
    95

    Cool When should one consider doing a TREN Cycle

    hi all,

    Just curious, How many cycles you should have under your belt before doing a tren acetate cycle.

    I'm just looking for information for future. Is it the most powerful roid on market? How long does people run it for? How strong is it as compare to test e.


    Thanks all

    was wondering about all these questions.

  2. #2
    austinite's Avatar
    austinite is offline HRT Specialist ~ AR-Platinum Elite-Hall of Famer ~
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Cialis, Texas
    Posts
    31,155
    Nothing set in stone. For me, I ran several test cycles. Then cycled some other compounds, then I ran tren. Generally it's a good idea to have a few cycles under your belt.

    Read this: http://forums.steroid.com/showthread...ctively-thread!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    GuidoTown
    Posts
    95
    Quote Originally Posted by austinite View Post
    Nothing set in stone. For me, I ran several test cycles. Then cycled some other compounds, then I ran tren. Generally it's a good idea to have a few cycles under your belt.

    Read this: http://forums.steroid.com/showthread...ctively-thread!
    mind=blown, tren is 5 times stronger. I know guys who are running a gram per week. lol at this if its 5 times stronger, 5g of test is a lot.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    METHAMERICA
    Posts
    16,397
    Time it's ran is dependent on the ester Tren A or Tren E, It is considered 5X stronger than Test. Experience before Tren can vary on a number of different thing such as AAS knowledge, maturity, cyle history and so on.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    1,196
    I would say that stats is the most important factor. If you are still under your "genetic potential" testosterone alone should have you growing a lot! You can only grow so much on a cycle, and if test can take you there. Why tren?

  6. #6
    austinite's Avatar
    austinite is offline HRT Specialist ~ AR-Platinum Elite-Hall of Famer ~
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Cialis, Texas
    Posts
    31,155
    In my experience helping folks, lot's of first timers are geared towards tren for it's "Fat Burning" properties, nutrient partitioning if you will. Which I believe is the wrong reason to run tren if you are at a higher BF%. Waste of money. Not that OP is overweight, I haven't seen stats. Just a random statement.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    1,196
    What do you think is preferable:
    Running a testosterone cycle to cut or running a cycle with trenbolone to cut? Or neither..............

  8. #8
    austinite's Avatar
    austinite is offline HRT Specialist ~ AR-Platinum Elite-Hall of Famer ~
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Cialis, Texas
    Posts
    31,155
    Quote Originally Posted by Sworder View Post
    What do you think is preferable:
    Running a testosterone cycle to cut or running a cycle with trenbolone to cut? Or neither..............
    incredibly broad question......

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    1,196
    Yes, I know!
    I think the compounds are good for like Lunk said. Saving muscle. But let's say you have 30 year old 20% BF that is dead set on a cycle. I mean, he won't really benefit a lot of "fat burning" effects from the testosterone. Also, he doesn't have a lot of muscle that needs saving so to speak. What do?

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    GuidoTown
    Posts
    95
    What kind of muscle gain can you expect from a 12 week tren acetate cycle at 400mg?

    I am reading the article as well for the answer to the above question.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    1,196
    Quote Originally Posted by honeysingh View Post
    What kind of muscle gain can you expect from a 12 week tren acetate cycle at 400mg?
    I am reading the article as well for the answer to the above question.
    It's not about the drugs, that's the thing! Drugs are such a small part of it. I have a friend that ran 3 cycles, two with Trenbolone. He is 174lbs still @ 5'10". Trust me, I have given him all the advice I can. DIET and TRAINING is your base. From that you can build a lot.

    I wouldn't run trenbolone until you are down to 10% BF 190lbs:ish. There is just no point! Testosterone will give you everything you need still!

  12. #12
    austinite's Avatar
    austinite is offline HRT Specialist ~ AR-Platinum Elite-Hall of Famer ~
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Cialis, Texas
    Posts
    31,155
    Quote Originally Posted by Sworder View Post
    Yes, I know!
    I think the compounds are good for like Lunk said. Saving muscle. But let's say you have 30 year old 20% BF that is dead set on a cycle. I mean, he won't really benefit a lot of "fat burning" effects from the testosterone. Also, he doesn't have a lot of muscle that needs saving so to speak. What do?
    Same could be said about any compound.

    A guy who knows how to eat will cut better on a dbol/drol stack (not that I recommend that) than the guy who eats like shit on a test/tren stack.

    Of course, everyone will benefit from tren's nutrient partitioning, and that would be just ideal if side effects weren't amplified at higher body fat. So that's where my statement above come in: "Which I believe is the wrong reason to run tren if you are at a higher BF%."

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    1,196
    Quote Originally Posted by austinite View Post
    Same could be said about any compound.

    A guy who knows how to eat will cut better on a dbol/drol stack (not that I recommend that) than the guy who eats like shit on a test/tren stack.

    Of course, everyone will benefit from tren's nutrient partitioning, and that would be just ideal if side effects weren't amplified at higher body fat. So that's where my statement above come in: "Which I believe is the wrong reason to run tren if you are at a higher BF%."
    I agree.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    GuidoTown
    Posts
    95
    Thanks everybody.

    Nah i am not overweight. I have heard a lot about tren, in my free time I just like to read about steroid profile to widen my knowledge. I have only done one cycle of Test E, in future i will def run tren , probably in my 5th cycle or so..

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    1,196
    What are your stats if you don't mind sharing?

  16. #16
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    GuidoTown
    Posts
    95
    I have posted my states before,

    196lbs at probably 15-18% bf, 5'10, thinking about running a test prop cycle for 8 weeks with 4 weeks of clen use to drop the bf.

  17. #17
    austinite's Avatar
    austinite is offline HRT Specialist ~ AR-Platinum Elite-Hall of Famer ~
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Cialis, Texas
    Posts
    31,155
    Quote Originally Posted by honeysingh View Post
    I have posted my states before,

    196lbs at probably 15-18% bf, 5'10, thinking about running a test prop cycle for 8 weeks with 4 weeks of clen use to drop the bf.
    update your profile with your stats please. No one wants to search your previous threads to find your stats

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    METHAMERICA
    Posts
    16,397
    My opinion..for what it's worth is that both can be used while cutting to help avoid muscle wasting on a calorie restricted diet. I like Test/tren to cut but I do agree it's not a replacement for diet and exercise

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    200
    I personally can't run tren, I have male pattern baldness I'd have a crown if I did that shit. I'd say that's a factor!

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    1,196
    Why noob alert? Gotta start somewhere..

    I would focus first and foremost on cutting the bodyfat. When you are cutting you won't be able to gain muscle and I would try to use the drugs to help me cut all the fat really quick and then build from there with lean gains. In all honesty, you should be able to cut now as well. It's usually a problem of motivation and that's where guys hurt. But staying lean:ish is a 24/7 thing, not just on cycle! You are going to have to control your diet off-cycle and you can accomplish tons before your next cycle and then gain muscle!

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    METHAMERICA
    Posts
    16,397
    Quote Originally Posted by Sworder View Post
    Why noob alert? Gotta start somewhere..

    I would focus first and foremost on cutting the bodyfat. When you are cutting you won't be able to gain muscle and I would try to use the drugs to help me cut all the fat really quick and then build from there with lean gains. In all honesty, you should be able to cut now as well. It's usually a problem of motivation and that's where guys hurt. But staying lean:ish is a 24/7 thing, not just on cycle! You are going to have to control your diet off-cycle and you can accomplish tons before your next cycle and then gain muscle!
    I dont find this to be entirely true. If you eat just below maintanence and have a good work ethic in the gym recomp can happen.

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    1,196
    Yes, it can to an extent. I believe it to be best to focus on one or the other. The more drugs you use the more recomp you will get. Also, the more damage and stress you are putting on your body.

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    METHAMERICA
    Posts
    16,397
    Quote Originally Posted by Sworder View Post
    Yes, it can to an extent. I believe it to be best to focus on one or the other. The more drugs you use the more recomp you will get. Also, the more damage and stress you are putting on your body.
    I agree it isn't easy but it is indeed doable!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •