Thoughts on this topic please
Associate Member
Thoughts on this topic please
HRT Specialist ~ AR-Platinum Elite-Hall of Famer ~
Yes, there have been several logs. Type that into search.
~ PLEASE DO NOT ASK FOR SOURCE CHECKS ~
"It's human nature in a 'more is better' society full of a younger generation that expects instant gratification, then complain when they don't get it. The problem will get far worse before it gets better". ~ kelkel
Junior Member
Been on for 10 days, lost 5 lbs, endurance is big, focus is up and mood is super ! But somehow I missed the Wikipedia's first sentence where Glaxo discontinued their research because it was found to cause cancer!!!!? Nice miss by me.. Anyone have feedback on that?
Knowledgeable Member
1) wiki isn't always the most reliable source of information. But having said that I don't know this is be untrue.Originally Posted by Keenstyle1
2) there are literally tens of thousands of substance we ingest daily that are ingredients in everyday items that have been linked to cancer.
That said hopefully someone can shed some light on this because I am curious about this stuff as well.
Disappointment* Known SCAMMER - Do Not Trust *
You didnt miss it..It was actually mistakenly (IMO) just added to wiki based on erroneous information provided by WADA in an effort to support the recent (very recent) banning of GW. There is only one study that shows cancer and it is in rats at high dosages(New scientist erroneously reported at any dose but the HED is higher than we would ever take-like- to the tune on 450mg/1800mg or 3600mg/day- we take what 5-15 mg/day?). Anything in exorbitant doses seems to cause cancer - look at artificial sweeteners.
The product went through 4 human clinical trials with absolutely no note of any adverse effects. In fact PRAR Modulators as a category show very little in the way of adverse effects other than increased risk for stomach polyps which is easily avoided by taking a cox2 inhibitor.
This is where wiki falls well short. If anyone can find ANY data from GSK clinical trails to this effect - show me. Check the refs from wiki to support this contention - you will see exactly what I mean.
Wiki is great for general info but if you often check the refs thats where you can see the errors in interpretation or outright misinformation. Until I see some real evidence im calling witch hunt and propaganda perpitrated or started by WADA perpetuated by irresponsible reporting and now wiki.
As far as GW itself I have no personal experience using it - so I can not comment/respond to the OP's question.
Last edited by jimmyinkedup; 03-28-2013 at 06:53 AM.
Disappointment* Known SCAMMER - Do Not Trust *
In the very same reference used to support the claims...I found this. What a joke.
BTW for those not interested in reading it- it states GW prevents proliferation of pancreatic cancer in HUMANS.
Last edited by jimmyinkedup; 03-28-2013 at 06:55 AM.
Banned
Yup, I was just going to post here that a quick search on pubmed.org will yield several studies (SEVERAL studies) that demonstrate GW's effectiveness at preventing certain cancers.
New Member
IS there a suggested dosage for the rat with this product?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote