Well, my last thread didnt get much attention but basically I wanted to know which cycle would give me strength and a more ripped look: Test 600mg/ eq 600mg or test 100mg/ tren 250mg. Test/eq would be run 15 weeks and test/tren would run 10 weeks
Well, my last thread didnt get much attention but basically I wanted to know which cycle would give me strength and a more ripped look: Test 600mg/ eq 600mg or test 100mg/ tren 250mg. Test/eq would be run 15 weeks and test/tren would run 10 weeks
Both would work well. Everyones different so no one knows what would work best for you.
As far as strength gains go which is typically more effective? I know everyone is different but in general what would you think?
Tren. But tren is a lot harsher on your organs as will as uncomfortable side effects. It had an anabolic/androgenic rating of 500:500 compared to EQ at 100:50. Read:
Equipoise - Steroid .com
Trenbolone - Steroid .com
Personally I choose tren.
EQ is worthless and can`t in any way be compared to Tren.
Thanks guys, you just confirmed my own thoughts. I was unsure because of the difference in doses
Love these questions!
Ive had my biggest strength on EQ so thats my pick
as for the side effects i disagree and would say me personally EQs sides were alot worse.
You should be able to stay lean on test alone. Diet is the key.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)