So what is the general consensus here? Just wondering. Some people say 600mg/week, but i feel like EQ should be ran higher. Thoughts?
So what is the general consensus here? Just wondering. Some people say 600mg/week, but i feel like EQ should be ran higher. Thoughts?
Have a friend that ran 600/wk and loved it. He was reminiscing today actually. Seems there are not many eq fans on this board. Some like it, most don't.
I run it for 600mg, as that seems to be the sweet spot.
Fvcking useless at any dose..... That's been my personal experience
600mg was a waste of oil for me. I`ll never touch the stuff again even for free.
I'd rather inject shards of glass with a 2 gauge funnel into an open wound.
~ PLEASE DO NOT ASK FOR SOURCE CHECKS ~
"It's human nature in a 'more is better' society full of a younger generation that expects instant gratification, then complain when they don't get it. The problem will get far worse before it gets better". ~ kelkel
Wheres the can?
LOL. Not really sure about THAT!Originally Posted by austinite
Useless at any dose IMHO and for those who speak highly of it which are very few they are getting confused with the other compounds within the stack what is causing the gains. If your going to inject a steroid to produce muscle gains then use something what will do the job and not something what is weak, poor and useless.
So if you guys say it is useless, what is your take on it when Ben Johnson used it in the olympics and killed everyone on it by a mile and says his success was from eq?
Ah i see
Ben Johnson used winstrol not EQ for sure. EQ is the ugly bastard child of steroids that nobody likes.
Im not hell bent on trying it. I HAVE tried it and i love EQOriginally Posted by marcus300
.
Hmmm. The documentary i watched "bigger stronger faster" talks about him using eq.Originally Posted by redz
And eq is used as a BASE to a cycle for added results, not to be used as a main component with a "test base" lol.Originally Posted by marcus300
What do you mean horrible analogy? I thought it was basic knowledge that you dont use EQ as your main on a cycle. Please elaborate and give a better analogy if you are going to knock mine.Originally Posted by jimmyinkedup
EQ is a weak compound and the small few who like it are being tricked by the other compounds within the stack, why even use something what doesn't produce gains when there are plenty of other compounds what will put some decent size on your frame. If you like it carry on using it but for me I wouldn't use it ever again.
Last edited by marcus300; 11-12-2013 at 09:48 AM.
UnderstoodOriginally Posted by marcus300
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)