Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Aveed?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Chicken All Day
    Posts
    1,991

    Aveed?

    Anyone on here take this? If so how does it work? Do you have to take HGC and an AI with it?
    5 shots a year that's seems like a pretty good plan.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    74
    It's a good product in that sense. I'm currently on Nebido, which is the same product made by other manufacturer. And the third brand of testosterone undecanoate is Reandron. So you can find quite a bit of information about using them by googling. With Nebido and Reandron it's 1000mg per shot while I believe Aveed is 750mg.

    What I personally don't like about it in my case, is that it peaks quite high while the trough is very low. And being E2 sensitive it's really hard to control. This could improve over the time, but would take patience. A lots of it when thinking the injection frequency and when the manufacturer studies say that the steady levels are reached in between 3rd and 5th injections. But that's just my case, don't let it necessarily affect to your decision.

    HCG you can use with it like with any other esters, good protocols available for that. Using it with long ester you don't need to worry about timing of it that much.

    I have to take AI unfortunately, but there's many who don't need. You just need to find out yourself if you manage without. Still, it's a good idea to have it on hand if needed.

    But if you feel good while on it and don't run into any problems, injecting only a couple of times per year being on trt is quite a good thing.

    There's a thread started by me about Nebido on this forum, if you're interested. It contains some lab data.
    Last edited by FakeLove; 03-13-2015 at 02:46 AM.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Montreal Canada
    Posts
    1,357
    i havent reserched this at all, i assumed test injected subQ gets absorbed over a longer period compared to IM injections, so this may minimise the spike??

  4. #4
    human project's Avatar
    human project is offline Knowledgeable Member~Recognized Member Winner - $100
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    1,909
    Quote Originally Posted by Simon1972
    i havent reserched this at all, i assumed test injected subQ gets absorbed over a longer period compared to IM injections, so this may minimise the spike??
    I've herd that sub q test injections result in a lower amount of conversion to estrogen... I don't know it this is true tho I just remember reading it somewhere.. I'm sure a quick google search should shed some light on the topic

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    30,269
    Quote Originally Posted by human project View Post
    I've herd that sub q test injections result in a lower amount of conversion to estrogen... I don't know it this is true tho I just remember reading it somewhere.. I'm sure a quick google search should shed some light on the topic
    Yes for 2 reasons. 1 it absorbs slower through the fat than muscle and most people who do it also cut their amount in 1/2 and inject 2x a week thus lowering spikes and less chance of estrogen conversion.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Montreal Canada
    Posts
    1,357
    Quote Originally Posted by lovbyts View Post
    Yes for 2 reasons. 1 it absorbs slower through the fat than muscle and most people who do it also cut their amount in 1/2 and inject 2x a week thus lowering spikes and less chance of estrogen conversion.
    so based on that reasoning alone, would one benefit from a subQ for both conversion and slowing down absorption/lowering spike?

    humanproject--->https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n98L...ature=youtu.be

    yes you read right.
    Last edited by Simon1972; 03-16-2015 at 02:38 AM.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    30,269
    ^^^^ watched the video. That's what I said.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Montreal Canada
    Posts
    1,357
    Quote Originally Posted by lovbyts View Post
    ^^^^ watched the video. That's what I said.
    ok ok..credit to you too lovbyts

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    74
    Undecanoate is quite expensive and while subQ automatically means more frequent injections it feels like it wouldn't make sense to do frequent subQ's with a slow ester? At least when there's cheaper options available, that are proven to work on that purpose. I've seen a lab data of only one patient doing subQ Undecanoate injections and accumulation became a problem there quite fast, so he switched back to IM injections. Other information about it being used subQ I haven't found.

    In terms of practicality Undecanoate would be a really convenient to use (even IM) if you respond to it like the manufacturer says you should. Meaning at peak it would take you close to the range max and at trough you would still be around mid range or slightly below. That would be still controllable and would mean only few injections per year.

    Even though it didn't work for me with a standard protocol, I believe on this forum there's happy users injecting every 8 to 12 weeks.
    Last edited by FakeLove; 03-16-2015 at 10:29 AM.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •