
Originally Posted by
PrettyPlease?
Wow this is frustrating.... I feel like this is circular logic going on here. I make a statement, that statement is challenged, I provide support for my initial statement and then I am told that I am splitting hairs.
No angle here. Yes I am splitting hairs because that is what I am arguing. Never said that exogenous test was good for sperm production, simply that there are studies that show high levels of exogenous test support (maintain, preserve, conserve, retain, or whatever other synonym one would like) spermatogenesis. Not advocating anything other than the aforementioned position.
Fine. I'm not disagreeing with you on that point.
As for your comment about what they teach in college physiology. I took it as condescending because I have picked up on a "good ol boys" type feel around here and your following comment about me being "some random new member" reinforces that in my mind. Post count or join date is not a reflection of knowledge just for future reference.
No shit. "VET" is an earned title/rank here. It has nothing to do with post count.
And we likely have less "good ol' boy" stuff here than any other BBing/AAS site.
Lastly, testosterone is, generally speaking, not regarded as an effective male contraceptive. It has and is being studied as such but is not currently used for said purpose.
That doesn't mean that it is ineffective as such, but that there are dozens of other reasons why doctors won't just start handing out 300 mg/week of test to any guy who asks for it.