
Originally Posted by
magic32
Sounds like a solid plan, but there's no need for both SERMS.
Even in harsh multi-compound cycles, they both perform the same receptor blocking function on the same tissue types, i.e., both have been clinically proven to select and modulate (exert a modifying or controlling influence on) the SAME estrogen receptors, making the employment of both compounds superflous. Of course this doesn't stop many bb'ers from the sheep-like behavior of superstitiously taking both for their own peace of mind, which won't hurt. However, it's better to defer in such instances to science rather than conjectural, albeit, consensus/popular opinion. They are quite analogous to Coke and Pepsi, that is two high quality colas which satisfy the same Cola desire in negligibly different ways. It comes down to preference, the sweeter Pepsi (Nolva of which less is required dosage-wise to satiate the sweet tooth) or the more tart Coke (Clomid which takes more to satiate)...metaphorically speaking of course.
Furthermore, Octane recommended HCG, which isn't bad advice. However, I'm a PRN guy. Consequently, I'd say only add ancilary compounds AS NEEDED, i.e., 'when necessary', unless of course previous cycleSS (intentionally and emphatically plural - don't decide after just one) have dictated a CLEAR propensity for specific problems or sensitivity inclinations towards specific conditions, i.e., acne/shacne/bacne, gyno, mood swings, excessive bloating, etc.
NOTE: Keep an eye on your local government, as gyms are reopening with greater frequency lately.
Best to you.