salam alaykomAmerica & Britain do not want peace. World peace would cause the global economy to collapse. Defence is the single most lucrative industry in the world.
If terrorists & militants around the world put down their arms today, Bush, Blair & many of their friends would lose $billions.
Money is always a major factor in political decision making.
Britain & America like to stir up war because they profit from it.
That is why, for example, Britain is pushing arms to India, for them to use against Pakistan: Britain 'Pushing arms to India'
Britain is also selling arms to Pakistan, to use against India!
(Britain Pushing arms to Pakistan)
War & politics are driven by greed.
Events today are also driven by a need to destabilize the world - both to make money and to enable the foundation of the New World Order.
The Illuminati are often the driving force behind both sides in a conflict. Their goals transverse politics and war.
VOTING IS MEANINGLESS
Bilderberg Group corporations like McDonalds, GAP & Exxon (And formerly Enron) fund the politicians, parties & political events of every major political party in the Western world. Funding is given to parties ACCROSS THE ENTIRE POLITICAL SPECTRUM.
The amount offered is decided by the relative level of influence the beneficiary groups or individuals hold.
Policy is purchased, in secret deals behind closed doors and through a network of elite companies & individuals.
Globalization, the IMF, WTO & World Bank: Tools of the Bilderberg Group
AMERICAN SUICIDE
The terrorists who have attacked America & will attack again were armed & trained in paramilitary violence by American soldiers & the CIA. America then set out seemingly to anger those same well-armed, well-trained terrorists as much as possible:
"Afghanistan was an important Cold War battleground, where the US backed Islamic warriors in their fight against the Soviet-backed government in Kabul."
(They were armed, funded & supported by American Special Forces.)
"The United States ... supplied the rebels with millions of dollars' worth of weapons. A turning point came in 1986, when the United States supplied the mujahadeen with shoulder-fired Stinger missiles"
EXPLAINING TERRORIST ANGER:
America trained & also MOTIVATED these extremists!
AFGHANISTAN WAS NOT INVADED BECAUSE OF SEPT 11:
(THE INVASION WAS PLANNED YEARS AGO - FOR OIL):
Quotes from a document written in 1998 & available on Official US Website:
"CentGas can not begin construction until an internationally recognized Afghanistan Government is in place."
(So the only solution is a government placed in power by America.)
"If it wasn't for the courage and the bravery of the people of Afghanistan, we would still be in the middle of a cold war, spending $100 billion a year more trying to defend ourselves from the Russians. It was their strength and courage that broke the will of the Kremlin leaders. They decided that they could not stand up to this kind of resistance among the people of the world. "
(Meaning that the CIA taught these people to use terrorist techniques, 'for use against Russia')
FACE THE AWFUL TRUTH! Do you think this 1998 document pointing out the need for the installation of a new government in Afghanistan is co-incidence?
Do you really believe, after reading that OFFICIAL document on an OFFICIAL GOVERNMENT website that the war on terror has nothing to do with the oil that Bush, his family & his friends make so much money from?
Face facts: Sept 11 was at the very least financially convenient for these people, as this article shows. They managed both to catch Osama bin Laden AND get their oil*...
*Oh, but they never DID get Osama bin Laden, did they: Just the oil.
Now Afghanistan is about to be used for attacks on Iraq, Iran & the Palestinian authority. These attacks will yield terrible terrorism on American soil, using weapons of mass-destruction. And Bush knows it.
Reply With Quote
Originally Posted by OGPackin
Yeah, we all know that the powers of the world are clamoring over each other to get their hands on those huge Afghan oil deposits. Afghanistan doesn't even rank in the top 20 producers of oil in the world. The country at number 20 produces 0.8 million barrels/day, so obviously Afghanistan produces less than that. Less than 0.8 million barrels/day barely puts a dent into the 18.5 million barrels that the U.S. consumes per day. If the war was really over oil don't you think that the U.S. might actually go somewhere that had oil. Saudi Arabia is number 1 with 7.7 million barrels/day, and Iran is number 4 with 3.6 million barrels/day. If we were just picking on a middle eastern country to steal their oil, why would we not go there? Or we could make it even easier. We could just get the oil from our next door neighbors. Mexico comes in at number 7 with 3.0 million barrels/day, and Canada comes in at number 14 with 1.9 million barrels/day (both produce much more than Afghanistan). It would certainly have cost America less money, and have been easier militarily to take over Mexico or Canada than Afghanistan. Why didn't we? Because the Afghani government gave support to the terrorists that were responsible for 9-11. To believe that we attacked Afghanistan over oil is to ignore all common sense.
