Page 1 of 5 12345 LastLast
Results 1 to 40 of 225

Thread: HTPA Shutdown....

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    5,714

    HTPA Shutdown....

    Ok, so we know that certain steroids shut you down and do it very fast. Every compound you take will at the very least suppress you.

    So if were are talking about cycles, short in duration or long....with compounds that shut you down, not just suppress...i.e 19-Nor's (Deca/Tren)


    Most user's in here that I see (or at least myself) use a 19-Nor is just about every cycle. For me it's mainly Tren, but I know alot of people love Deca when bulking. So length of the cycle aside, when using any of the aforementioned drugs we are going to suffer from complete HTPA shutdown.

    So the question then becomes....if we suffer complete HTPA shutdown within the first few days of using these harsh drugs, does it then matter how long we cycle for? This question was inspired by the yesterdays thread year long cycle. I began to think to myself, once one's HTPA is shutdown completely, does it matter how long it remains shutdown? Does the body somehow know the amount of time one is shutdown?

    My thoughts would be that once you are shutdown you are shutdown and it will be equally as hard to restore HTPA function after a 8 week cycle or after a 8 month cycle. Anecdotally some users report that longer cycles take longer to recover from. That would lead to one conclusion, that the body does indeed sense the duration of shutdown and the longer one is shutdown the harder it is to restore HTPA function. My guess at the cause of this would be that during longer periods of shutdown perhaps eventually the body begins to forget how to produce endogenous hormones etc....?

    I'd love to hear some thoughts and opinions on this matter.
    "without your word you're a shell of a man" - Tupac

    ***Giants11 is a fictional character any advice given is purely for entertainment purposes, always consult a physician before taking any supplements, drugs or changing your diet.***

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    God's colon.
    Posts
    641
    I can only provide feedback on how the mechanism works as I've had to study it for many classes. The HPTA is nothing more than a negative-feedback cycle. Meaning that plasma levels of Testosterone are what tells your brain the body has enough testosterone, don't make more. So it doesn't send the chemical messengers that are used by the leydig cells in testicles to produce testosterone. Thus, the balls shutdown after an extended period and they shrink a tad as the leydig and sertoli cells kind of go dormant.

    After saying all of that, my take on this is that it is OK to do an extended period of SOME anabolics. Clearly there are some that are harmful to the liver or hard on the prostate (DHT's). I made a post a while back on the cytotoxicity of trenbolone in cellular mitosis, which raised a big red flag in my head. Definitely not something I would do for a year.

    In regards to the HPTA, I would have to do a bit more research on something that really isn't researched, but the testicles don't die. AIDS/Burn victims are put on steroids to combat body wasting for months to years. As long as you get cholesterol and BP checked regularly I don't see it being that bad. Utilizing HCG when you come off cycle would be paramount but with today's tools I think the recovery time is much exaggerated... but I think most of the stuff people just PARROT on these boards is exaggerated, like when people should start or what type of cycle to do first. It is all just speculation since each person is different. So, for me the bottom line is, I would do a year long cycle if I thought I would benefit from it.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    5,714
    Quote Originally Posted by Serotonin
    I can only provide feedback on how the mechanism works as I've had to study it for many classes. The HPTA is nothing more than a negative-feedback cycle. Meaning that plasma levels of Testosterone are what tells your brain the body has enough testosterone, don't make more. So it doesn't send the chemical messengers that are used by the leydig cells in testicles to produce testosterone. Thus, the balls shutdown after an extended period and they shrink a tad as the leydig and sertoli cells kind of go dormant.

    After saying all of that, my take on this is that it is OK to do an extended period of SOME anabolics. Clearly there are some that are harmful to the liver or hard on the prostate (DHT's). I made a post a while back on the cytotoxicity of trenbolone in cellular mitosis, which raised a big red flag in my head. Definitely not something I would do for a year.

    In regards to the HPTA, I would have to do a bit more research on something that really isn't researched, but the testicles don't die. AIDS/Burn victims are put on steroids to combat body wasting for months to years. As long as you get cholesterol and BP checked regularly I don't see it being that bad. Utilizing HCG when you come off cycle would be paramount but with today's tools I think the recovery time is much exaggerated... but I think most of the stuff people just PARROT on these boards is exaggerated, like when people should start or what type of cycle to do first. It is all just speculation since each person is different. So, for me the bottom line is, I would do a year long cycle if I thought I would benefit from it.

    I agree with a lot of what you are saying. And I definitely agree with what compounds are run and for how long. For example I would never run Tren for months, as well as DHT derivatives or the Prostates sake as well.

    It does seem however that you could cycle for long periods of time, while changing compounds and doses accordingly to prevent major side effects. And absolutely methylated androgens should not be take for weeks on end, I am focused more on injectables.
    "without your word you're a shell of a man" - Tupac

    ***Giants11 is a fictional character any advice given is purely for entertainment purposes, always consult a physician before taking any supplements, drugs or changing your diet.***

  4. #4
    I was on a 3 year straight cycle, and my total testosterone levels were roughly 250ish (300 is the low end of normal) 3 weeks upon cessation. When I was 19, before ever using steroids, my test levels were 650ish. I doubt I would ever get back there, but I would bet that within a few more weeks, my test levels would be in the low/medium/normal range.

    Although I should mention that the last 6 months of my 3 year cycle, I was on HRT doses (100mgs of prop/EOD) which got my test levels to 950ish, which is still High/Normal.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    5,714
    Quote Originally Posted by Anthony Roberts
    I was on a 3 year straight cycle, and my total testosterone levels were roughly 250ish (300 is the low end of normal) 3 weeks upon cessation. When I was 19, before ever using steroids, my test levels were 650ish. I doubt I would ever get back there, but I would bet that within a few more weeks, my test levels would be in the low/medium/normal range.

    Although I should mention that the last 6 months of my 3 year cycle, I was on HRT doses (100mgs of prop/EOD) which got my test levels to 950ish, which is still High/Normal.
    I would be willing to bet that over time, if you shutdown your HTPA, you will never see the same Test levels that you once had.

    Granted I have no evidence to support this, just anecdotally, my bloodwork has shown that since my first or second cycle my Test has never fully gotten back to the levels that they once were when I was in my early 20's.....A price I pay gladly.
    "without your word you're a shell of a man" - Tupac

    ***Giants11 is a fictional character any advice given is purely for entertainment purposes, always consult a physician before taking any supplements, drugs or changing your diet.***

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    2,222
    Quote Originally Posted by Giants11
    my bloodwork has shown that since my first or second cycle my Test has never fully gotten back to the levels that they once were when I was in my early 20's.....A price I pay gladly.
    That is to be expected if cycling or not.

    T-levels will be on a all time high in late teens, b/f they slowly start decreasing a little bit every year for the rest of your live.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    God's colon.
    Posts
    641
    Quote Originally Posted by vitor
    That is to be expected if cycling or not.

    T-levels will be on a all time high in late teens, b/f they slowly start decreasing a little bit every year for the rest of your live.
    Yea, not sure how many people know this but many men go through andropause and don't even know about it in their mid to late stages of life. Test levels get so low it affects mood (sense of well being), bone density, lean body mass, and a slew of other things.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    2,222
    Quote Originally Posted by Anthony Roberts
    I was on a 3 year straight cycle, and my total testosterone levels were roughly 250ish (300 is the low end of normal) 3 weeks upon cessation. When I was 19, before ever using steroids, my test levels were 650ish. I doubt I would ever get back there, but I would bet that within a few more weeks, my test levels would be in the low/medium/normal range.

    Although I should mention that the last 6 months of my 3 year cycle, I was on HRT doses (100mgs of prop/EOD) which got my test levels to 950ish, which is still High/Normal.
    From your example it would indicate that the amount of time youre ON, doesnt make a big diffrence as far as pct/recovery in concerned...

    Do you think that your last 3 months with HRT dose was the key factor in your recovery there?
    (b/c 3 years is a freaky long time)

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Anywhere...
    Posts
    15,725
    Quote Originally Posted by vitor
    From your example it would indicate that the amount of time youre ON, doesnt make a big diffrence as far as pct/recovery in concerned...

    Do you think that your last 3 months with HRT dose was the key factor in your recovery there?
    (b/c 3 years is a freaky long time)
    I was under the impression, that if your leydig cells were shot, PCT is going to be very counterproductive with SERM/AI's. This is often why PCT protocols are nothing but useless and a waste of money.

    There often too short. 3-4 weeks, isnt sufficient time IMHO. 4-8 weeks is. It also ***ends greatly on what compounds you've used, AI's, HCG or not, length of shutdown, inhibition. Ones PCT protocol duration should change accordingly.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    uk
    Posts
    7,979
    Quote Originally Posted by Swifto
    I was under the impression, that if your leydig cells were shot, PCT is going to be very counterproductive with SERM/AI's. This is often why PCT protocols are nothing but useless and a waste of money.

    There often too short. 3-4 weeks, isnt sufficient time IMHO. 4-8 weeks is. It also ***ends greatly on what compounds you've used, AI's, HCG or not, length of shutdown, inhibition. Ones PCT protocol duration should change accordingly.
    Very true, the "industry standard" 4 week PCT of a SERM and an AI (or worse two SERMS) is a pointless waste of money IMO. PCT length should be dicatated by how long it takes to actually work!! In my experience 60 days would be a more appropriate length.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Long Island, NY
    Posts
    238
    u do pct.....bloodwork then shows all your levels to be in the normal range...could u still have an issue in regards to fertility?

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Anywhere...
    Posts
    15,725
    Quote Originally Posted by Giants11
    Ok, so we know that certain steroids shut you down and do it very fast. Every compound you take will at the very least suppress you.

    So if were are talking about cycles, short in duration or long....with compounds that shut you down, not just suppress...i.e 19-Nor's (Deca/Tren)


    Most user's in here that I see (or at least myself) use a 19-Nor is just about every cycle. For me it's mainly Tren, but I know alot of people love Deca when bulking. So length of the cycle aside, when using any of the aforementioned drugs we are going to suffer from complete HTPA shutdown.

    So the question then becomes....if we suffer complete HTPA shutdown within the first few days of using these harsh drugs, does it then matter how long we cycle for? This question was inspired by the yesterdays thread year long cycle. I began to think to myself, once one's HTPA is shutdown completely, does it matter how long it remains shutdown? Does the body somehow know the amount of time one is shutdown?

    My thoughts would be that once you are shutdown you are shutdown and it will be equally as hard to restore HTPA function after a 8 week cycle or after a 8 month cycle. Anecdotally some users report that longer cycles take longer to recover from. That would lead to one conclusion, that the body does indeed sense the duration of shutdown and the longer one is shutdown the harder it is to restore HTPA function. My guess at the cause of this would be that during longer periods of shutdown perhaps eventually the body begins to forget how to produce endogenous hormones etc....?

    I'd love to hear some thoughts and opinions on this matter.
    I think leydig cell desensitisation and them being unresponsive is a major factor. Once the leydig cells become unresponsive it doesnt matter what PCT meds you take, there not going to be producing testosterone anytime soon. Desensitisation of the leydig cells can take time and, I think, this is a major factor why someone thats cycled for 3 years will recover slower than someone for 3 months.

    Primary hypogonadism is what you really want to avoid. This is when the testes become unresponsive to LH/FSH, also known as Klinefelter's syndrome (one example). As a note, overuse of HCG can cause this.

    I'm not certain a bodybuilder can get this from staying shutdown or hypogondal for long peroids, but I suspect being shutdown for years leads to both primary and secondary hypogonadism.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    5,714
    Quote Originally Posted by Swifto
    I think leydig cell desensitisation and them being unresponsive is a major factor. Once the leydig cells become unresponsive it doesnt matter what PCT meds you take, there not going to be producing testosterone anytime soon. Desensitisation of the leydig cells can take time and, I think, this is a major factor why someone thats cycled for 3 years will recover slower than someone for 3 months.

    Primary hypogonadism is what you really want to avoid. This is when the testes become unresponsive to LH/FSH, also known as Klinefelter's syndrome (one example). As a note, overuse of HCG can cause this.

    I'm not certain a bodybuilder can get this from staying shutdown or hypogondal for long peroids, but I suspect being shutdown for years leads to both primary and secondary hypogonadism.
    Very good response. I would love to see some evidence on how long it takes fr Leydig cell desensitization and perhaps what drugs are worse than others...
    "without your word you're a shell of a man" - Tupac

    ***Giants11 is a fictional character any advice given is purely for entertainment purposes, always consult a physician before taking any supplements, drugs or changing your diet.***

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Anywhere...
    Posts
    15,725
    Quote Originally Posted by Giants11
    Very good response. I would love to see some evidence on how long it takes fr Leydig cell desensitization and perhaps what drugs are worse than others...
    I'm not entirely sure. I'm having a little look now.

    I know LH is the major regulator of Leydig cell differentiation and steroidogenic function. This is why HCG is so important to a bodybuilder.

    FSH is mainly for spermantageous production.

    If bodybuilders or those who have been on TRT/HRT for lengthy peroids, find it hard to have kids (fertility), that would suggest they suffer particially from primary hypogondism, aswell as secondary IMHO. As the testes are unresponsive to both LH/FSH.

  15. #15
    Quote Originally Posted by Swifto
    I'm not entirely sure. I'm having a little look now.

    I know LH is the major regulator of Leydig cell differentiation and steroidogenic function. This is why HCG is so important to a bodybuilder.

    FSH is mainly for spermantageous production.

    If bodybuilders or those who have been on TRT/HRT for lengthy peroids, find it hard to have kids (fertility), that would suggest they suffer particially from primary hypogondism, aswell as secondary IMHO. As the testes are unresponsive to both LH/FSH.
    FSH is actually important to keep high, because increased FSH leads to an increase in LH receptors.

    I would love to see some evidence on how long it takes fr Leydig cell desensitization and perhaps what drugs are worse than others...
    It would seem that length of time (IMHO) is not as important as dose, for Leydig Cell issues. As an example, we know that estrogen is one of the primary culprits in this issue, but that a single high dose of estrogen is worse for the leydig cells than a bunch of lower doses.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Anywhere...
    Posts
    15,725
    Quote Originally Posted by Anthony Roberts
    FSH is actually important to keep high, because increased FSH leads to an increase in LH receptors.


    It would seem that length of time (IMHO) is not as important as dose, for Leydig Cell issues. As an example, we know that estrogen is one of the primary culprits in this issue, but that a single high dose of estrogen is worse for the leydig cells than a bunch of lower doses.
    Is there an difinitive way of preventing the leydig cells from becoming desensitised, other than use HCG?

    And I guess avoiding aromotasables and keeping estrogen in normal/low ranges.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    England...
    Posts
    2,832
    The intricate solution that will revolutionize and deals with shutdown is Toremefine Citrate and Aromasin.Have been avoiding 19-nors for some time due to recovery,experimented last cycle using drol in a cutter (found it to be the best cutting tool too) Ran this PCT and its like the encrusted the tree of eden.Still going to keep cycles within 12 weeks range as your receptors get saturated and its hard to remain growing unless you mix and change compounds within the cycle.Its great as this means I can just use long esters (two) and an oral for the first 6-8 weeks.Great thread topic and we are going to crack this gaints...
    Last edited by goose; 06-26-2007 at 09:24 AM.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    God's colon.
    Posts
    641
    Quote Originally Posted by goose4
    The intricate solution that will revolutionize and deals with shutdown is Toremefine Citrate and Aromasin.Have been avoiding 19-nors for some time due to recovery,experimented last cycle using drol in a cutter (found it to be the best cutting tool too) Ran this PCT and its like the encrusted the tree of eden.Still going to keep cycles within 12 weeks range as your receptors get saturated and its hard to remain growing unless you mix and change compounds within the cycle.Its great as this means I can just use long esters (two) and an oral for the first 6-8 weeks.Great thread topic and we are going to crack this gaints...
    Check this out goose...

    Idiopathic hypogonadotropic hypogonadism in a male runner is reversed by clomiphene citrate

    Burge, Mark R.; Lanzi, Richard A.; Skarda, Shayne T.; Eaton, R. Philip

    Objective: To assess the efficacy of estrogen antagonist therapy on the function of the hypothalamic-pituitary-testicular axis in a young male runner with significant morbidity attributable to idiopathic hypogonadotropic hypogonadism.

    Design: An uncontrolled case study.

    Setting: The outpatient endocrinology clinic of a university tertiary referral center.

    Patient(s): A 29-year-old male who has run 50 to 90 miles per week since 15 years of age and who presented with a pelvic stress fracture, markedly decreased bone mineral density, and symptomatic hypogonadotropic hypogonadism.

    Intervention(s): Clomiphene citrate (CC) at doses up to 50 mg two times per day over a 5-month period.

    Main Outcome Measure(s): Serum concentrations of LH, FSH, and T before and after CC therapy, as well as clinical indicators of gonadal function.

    Result(s): Barely detectable levels of LH and FSH associated with hypogonadal levels of T were restored to the normal range with CC therapy. The patient experienced improved erectile function, increased testicular size and sexual hair growth, and an improved sense of well being.

    Conclusion(s): Exercise-induced hypogonadotropic hypogonadism exists as a clinical entity among male endurance athletes, and CC may provide a safe and effective treatment option for males with debilitating hypogonadism related to endurance exercise.


    I know this is old news Clomid, but it is interesting none the less. So with clomid and HCG, what are your guys test level differences after your first cycles? On average?
    Last edited by Serotonin; 06-26-2007 at 10:18 AM.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Anywhere...
    Posts
    15,725
    I think you really need an endriconologist to answer how long it takes for the leydig cells to become desensitised/unresponsive.

    I'd also suspect different compounds act differently. As not all compounds cause shutdown via the same action. Testosterone and 19-Nors for example.

  20. #20
    We really don't know enough about HCG, honestly. We don't even know, though it's unlikely, that doses typically used in this arena would desensitize the Leydigs. Additionally, there is a disparate effect with HCG in normal vs/ hypogonadic subjects, and we don't know if this is due to the presence of LH or testosterone or FSH or whatever. Trained athletes also have a disparate response to HCG...

    There's too many variables, but in my estimation, the chance of desensitizing your leydig cells from HCG is almost nothing.

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Anywhere...
    Posts
    15,725
    Quote Originally Posted by Anthony Roberts
    We really don't know enough about HCG, honestly. We don't even know, though it's unlikely, that doses typically used in this arena would desensitize the Leydigs. Additionally, there is a disparate effect with HCG in normal vs/ hypogonadic subjects, and we don't know if this is due to the presence of LH or testosterone or FSH or whatever. Trained athletes also have a disparate response to HCG...

    There's too many variables, but in my estimation, the chance of desensitizing your leydig cells from HCG is almost nothing.
    So could one stay shutdown and use HCG regularly to maintain leydig cells dont fully desensitise then? So recovery is still possible?

    I'm guessing no...

    Because natural testosterone levels cannot be maintained while hypogondal artificially (the use of anndrogens). Well, studies dont state it anyway.

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    God's colon.
    Posts
    641
    You know where you could make a ton of money? Finding something that could somehow inhibit the negative feedback cycle that leads to the hypogonadism associated with AAS use. Except I know nothing of the receptors on the hypothalamus... you could very well block the skeletal muscle receptors as well.

    It would be quite the endeavor though and one hell of a breakthrough if it is ever discovered.

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Anywhere...
    Posts
    15,725
    Quote Originally Posted by Serotonin
    You know where you could make a ton of money? Finding something that could somehow inhibit the negative feedback cycle that leads to the hypogonadism associated with AAS use. Except I know nothing of the receptors on the hypothalamus... you could very well block the skeletal muscle receptors as well.

    It would be quite the endeavor though and one hell of a breakthrough if it is ever discovered.
    Ahem...

    SARM's with no effect on the HPTA.

    Or a special injectable GnRH for bodybuilders.

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    torrance,ca
    Posts
    3,041
    Quote Originally Posted by Swifto
    Or a special injectable GnRH for bodybuilders.
    I don't think GnRH will work because GnRH has a very short half-life in the blood (approximately 2 to 5 minutes). The pituitary gland is therefore exposed to high levels of GnRH in hypophyseal-portal blood for brief periods of time.

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    torrance,ca
    Posts
    3,041
    Quote Originally Posted by Swifto
    Or a special injectable GnRH for bodybuilders.
    Upon further review it appears this may work to some degree. Since GnRH is pulsatile(peaks occur every 90-120 minutes) and if it were administered in such a fashion it would and has shone to increase LH and FSH. The pulsatile pattern of GnRH release appears to be essential for stimulatory effects on LH and FSH release.

  26. #26
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Anywhere...
    Posts
    15,725
    Quote Originally Posted by kfrost06
    Upon further review it appears this may work to some degree. Since GnRH is pulsatile(peaks occur every 90-120 minutes) and if it were administered in such a fashion it would and has shone to increase LH and FSH. The pulsatile pattern of GnRH release appears to be essential for stimulatory effects on LH and FSH release.
    Which means it would be very difficult for a bodybuilder to dose accordingly. Injections would be very frequent indeed.

  27. #27
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    5,714
    Quote Originally Posted by Serotonin
    You know where you could make a ton of money? Finding something that could somehow inhibit the negative feedback cycle that leads to the hypogonadism associated with AAS use. Except I know nothing of the receptors on the hypothalamus... you could very well block the skeletal muscle receptors as well.

    It would be quite the endeavor though and one hell of a breakthrough if it is ever discovered.

    I believe SARM's are close to being produced. I know GTXi Inc, is developing one.

    This would proportedly block the negative feedback loop.

    It has be theorized that ATD could also accomplish this, as it has been shown in rat models. This is something that Author L Rea suggested, however I have a real hard time taking anything he says seriously. However, there are some interesting abstracts around that I posted about a year ago, I'll dig it up.
    "without your word you're a shell of a man" - Tupac

    ***Giants11 is a fictional character any advice given is purely for entertainment purposes, always consult a physician before taking any supplements, drugs or changing your diet.***

  28. #28
    Quote Originally Posted by Giants11
    I believe SARM's are close to being produced. I know GTXi Inc, is developing one.

    This would proportedly block the negative feedback loop.
    It technically wouldn't even involve the loop. It's a non-hormonal stimulation of the AR.

    So could one stay shutdown and use HCG regularly to maintain leydig cells dont fully desensitise then? So recovery is still possible?
    I'm not sure what you're asking...

  29. #29
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    5,714
    Quote Originally Posted by Anthony Roberts
    It technically wouldn't even involve the loop. It's a non-hormonal stimulation of the AR.



    I'm not sure what you're asking...

    I see, so SARM's will not play a role in keeping one's HTPA alive on cycle?
    "without your word you're a shell of a man" - Tupac

    ***Giants11 is a fictional character any advice given is purely for entertainment purposes, always consult a physician before taking any supplements, drugs or changing your diet.***

  30. #30
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Anywhere...
    Posts
    15,725
    Quote Originally Posted by Anthony Roberts
    It technically wouldn't even involve the loop. It's a non-hormonal stimulation of the AR.



    I'm not sure what you're asking...
    Can HCG be used to keep the leydig cells responsive when shutdown from androgens? Or when LH/FSH arnt being naturally produced ie, shutdown?

    If, yes. Then wouldnt PCT be easier as the leydig cells are still responsive?

    Isnt it a wise idea to use low amounts of HCG during a cycle then?

  31. #31
    Quote Originally Posted by Swifto
    Can HCG be used to keep the leydig cells responsive when shutdown from androgens? Or when LH/FSH arnt being naturally produced ie, shutdown?

    If, yes. Then wouldnt PCT be easier as the leydig cells are still responsive?

    Isnt it a wise idea to use low amounts of HCG during a cycle then?
    Maybe. I'm not so sure it matters, honestly. I'll also shoot you straight, and say 2 things:

    1. I've been doing a lot of reading on HCG and I think it's effects on hypogonadic males is very different than normal males, and is again different in steroid using males, and it's ability to raise estrogen again, may be different in all those cases, and it's even different in athletes...etc...I need to centralize all my thoughts to be as lucid as possible.

    2. At the level of athlete I work with, they fall into one of 2 categories:

    a. Professional athlete in a drug tested sport...meaning they need undetectable stuff, and very mild cycles, and barely any pct

    b. Bodybuilder/Powerlifter...meaning they don't ever come off.


    So PCT has kind of gone on the back burner for me. I've been talking a lot to Eric Potratz (author/supp designer) about AIs (his new supplement which isn't out yet), and HCG...and that's the only reason I'm even researching it. But I think there's likely alot we don't know about it yet.

    2.

  32. #32
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    2,222
    I think exessive ammount of Estrogen will inhibit Leydig Cell development, growth and function, resulting in permenant supression of androgen production.

    (In rodent with "high" aromatase), I read a study(some time ago) that aromatase is expressed in both Leydic cells and Sertoil cells in the rodents fetal testis. Which resulted in declined androgen levels and infertelity in some cases.

    I have noticed from my own cycling that using AI on results in much better recovery aswell, not to mention that my T-levels are signifently higher(between cycles) when I have used letro or aromasin.

    It seems like the hypotalmus will decide what info to send down to Leydig cells, ***ending on how much estrogen it senses.

  33. #33
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    torrance,ca
    Posts
    3,041
    For those that are reading this but feel a little lost, there are three main components to the hormonal axis in men, 1.)the Hypothalamus, 2.) the Pituitary gland, and 3.) the Testis hence the H, P, T, and the A for axis. This axis functions in a tightly regulated manner to produce concentrations of circulating steroids (testosterone). When doing steroids you negatively disrupt the axis which then results in a decrease in your production of testosterone and in some cases stops your production of testosterone altogether. The million dollar question, does the amount of time your system is suppressed or shut down effect how long it takes your axis (HPTA) to "get back to normal"?

  34. #34
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Whereville
    Posts
    767
    Quote Originally Posted by kfrost06
    For those that are reading this but feel a little lost, there are three main components to the hormonal axis in men, 1.)the Hypothalamus, 2.) the Pituitary gland, and 3.) the Testis hence the H, P, T, and the A for axis. This axis functions in a tightly regulated manner to produce concentrations of circulating steroids (testosterone). When doing steroids you negatively disrupt the axis which then results in a decrease in your production of testosterone and in some cases stops your production of testosterone altogether. The million dollar question, does the amount of time your system is suppressed or shut down effect how long it takes your axis (HPTA) to "get back to normal"?
    That somehow clears things up...I will come back for comments later after I get done with this threads.

  35. #35
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    California
    Posts
    53
    Quote Originally Posted by kfrost06
    The million dollar question, does the amount of time your system is suppressed or shut down effect how long it takes your axis (HPTA) to "get back to normal"?
    Yes it does and some compounds will make this even worse.

    But there is light at the end of the tunnel, HPTA restoration will take 45 days for the most stubbern HPTA.

    Here is a PDF from a Doc on this very issue.

    Well, I was gonna link that but the file is too big.

  36. #36
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    2,222
    Quote Originally Posted by hackskii
    Yes it does and some compounds will make this even worse.

    But there is light at the end of the tunnel, HPTA restoration will take 45 days for the most stubbern HPTA.

    Here is a PDF from a Doc on this very issue.

    Well, I was gonna link that but the file is too big.
    Would be greate if you could get the study up anyways...
    Maybe try and shorten it down a little so you can get it up...

  37. #37
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    torrance,ca
    Posts
    3,041
    Quote Originally Posted by vitor
    Would be greate if you could get the study up anyways...
    Maybe try and shorten it down a little so you can get it up...
    The problem with shutting down the HPTA is it can be hard to get it up

  38. #38
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    California
    Posts
    53
    Quote Originally Posted by vitor
    Would be greate if you could get the study up anyways...
    Maybe try and shorten it down a little so you can get it up...
    It is a PDF and I have it on another site and this is the doctor that gave me his protocol.
    He basicly tracked 19 dudes blood work and LH and FSH and test levels, how much weight and percentage of bodyfat.

    I will copy and paste from PDF:
    It might look choppy.

    Objective
    To develop an approach to cycle androgens that would
    result in significant changes in body composition and
    accelerate the normalization of the hypothalamic
    pituitary gonadal axis (HPGA) after cessation of
    androgens.

    Methods
    An uncontrolled study of 19 HIV-negative eugonadal
    men, ages 23 – 57 years, administered testosterone
    cypionate and nandrolone decanoate for 12 weeks,
    and then were treated simultaneously with a combined
    regimen of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) (2500
    IU/QODx16d), clomiphene citrate (50 mg PO BID x 30d)
    and tamoxifen (20 mg PO QD x 45d), to restore the
    HPGA.

    Results
    Mean FFM by DEXA increased from 64.1 to 69.8 kg
    (p<.001); percent body fat decreased from 23.6 to 20.9
    (p<.01); strength increased significantly from 357.4 lb
    to 406.4 lb (p=.02). No significant changes in serum
    chemistries and liver function tests were found. HDL-C
    decreased from a mean value of 44.3 to 38.0 (p=.02).
    Mean values for luteinizing hormone (LH) and total
    testosterone (T) were 4.5 and 460, respectively prior
    to androgen treatment. At the conclusion of the 12-
    week treatment with androgens the mean LH <0.7
    (p<.001) and total testosterone was 1568 (p<.001). The
    mean values after treatment with the combined
    regimen were LH=6.2 and testosterone=458.

    Discussion
    The use of androgens has been reported to improve
    lean body mass, strength, sexual function, and mood
    accompanied by side effects caused by continuous
    uninterrupted use of these compounds (polycythemia,
    testicular atrophy, hypertension, liver dysfunction
    [oral androgens] and alopecia.) Androgen-induced
    HPGA suppression causes a severe hypogonadal state in
    most patients that often require an extensive period of
    considerable duration for normalization. This prevents
    most if not all individuals from cycling off these
    medications due to the adverse impact of this state on
    their previously gained LBM and quality of life. The
    protocol of hCG-clomiphene-tamoxifen was successful
    in restoring the HPGA within 45 days after androgen
    cessation. Further controlled studies are needed to
    determine if these results can be duplicated in HIVpositive
    subjects.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	scally1.JPG 
Views:	172 
Size:	72.9 KB 
ID:	82528   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	scally2.JPG 
Views:	175 
Size:	87.8 KB 
ID:	82529  
    Last edited by hackskii; 07-10-2007 at 03:21 PM.

  39. #39
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    5,714
    Here is some data that could suggest ATD could block the negative feedback loop:

    Effects of ATD on male sexual behavior and androgen receptor binding: a reexamination of the aromatization hypothesis.

    Kaplan ME, McGinnis MY.

    ***artment of Anatomy, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, CUNY, New York 10029.

    The aromatization hypothesis asserts that testosterone (T) must be aromatized to estradiol (E2) to activate copulatory behavior in the male rat. In support of this hypothesis, the aromatization inhibitor, ATD, has been found to suppress male sexual behavior in T-treated rats. In our experiment, we first replicated this finding by peripherally injecting ATD (15 mg/day) or propylene glycol into T-treated (two 10-mm Silastic capsules) or control castrated male rats. In a second experiment, we bilaterally implanted either ATD-filled or blank cannulae into the medial preoptic area (MPOA) of either T-treated or control castrated male rats. With this more local distribution of ATD, a lesser decline in sexual behavior was found, suggesting that other brain areas are involved in the neurohormonal activation of copulatory behavior in the male rat.To determine whether in vivo ATD interacts with androgen or estrogen receptors, we conducted cell nuclear androgen and estrogen receptor binding assays of hypothalamus, preoptic area, amygdala, and septum following treatment with the combinations of systemic T alone.ATD plus T, ATD alone, and blank control. In all four brain areas binding of T to androgen receptors was significantly decreased in the presence of ATD, suggesting that ATD may act both as an androgen receptor blocker and as an aromatization inhibitor. Competitive binding studies indicated that ATD competes in vitro for cytosol androgen receptors, thus substantiating the in vivo antiandrogenic effects of ATD. Cell nuclear estrogen receptor binding was not significantly increased by exposure to T in the physiological range. No agonistic properties of ATD were observed either behaviorally or biochemically. Thus, an alternative explanation for the inhibitory effects of ATD on male sexual behavior is that ATD prevents T from binding to androgen receptors.


    Effect of an inhibitor of aromatization, 1,4,6 androstatriene-3,17-dione (ATD) on LH release and steroid binding in hypothalamus of adult female rats.

    Slama A, Gogan F, Sarrieau A, Vial M, Rostene W, Kordon C.
    Exp Brain Res. 1986;64(3):407-10.

    Prevention of testosterone aromatization in the female rat pups by perinatal treatment with 1,4,6 androstatriene-3,17-dione (ATD) induces an important defeminization as shown by a reduction of fluctuations of LH release after castration and estradiol implantation. The fact that, under our in vitro experimental conditions, ATD is able to displace testosterone binding in the hypothalamus whereas estradiol does not, confirms the hypothesis that ATD acts on aromatase. The most attractive explanation for the defeminization effect of ATD is then an estrogen-like action of ATD.
    "without your word you're a shell of a man" - Tupac

    ***Giants11 is a fictional character any advice given is purely for entertainment purposes, always consult a physician before taking any supplements, drugs or changing your diet.***

  40. #40
    Dude....that study says that ATD is preventing androgens from binding to the androgen receptor and that it has estrogen like action.

Page 1 of 5 12345 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •