Results 1 to 16 of 16

Thread: Why Can't I Create A Signature?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    582

    Question Why Can't I Create A Signature?

    I had a sig here once before and now, it's gone and I don't have a setting for one. What seems to be the problem? HELP!!

    I brought the question to this forum, assuming that this forum was run by AR's Tech Support/MOD.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    PLZ dont IM me 4 Source's
    Posts
    734
    sigs were removed 3 or 4 days ago....

  3. #3
    so they allow gay-ass forum clogging avatars but no sig?!

    GAY

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    "What one man can do, another can do."
    5'10" 34 years old - Currently cutting:
    June 1st - 198lbs approx 20%BF :: June 15 - 190lbs 16.7%BF :: July 1st?...stay tuned
    Goal: 7% BF by Aug 1st (170lbs total body weight based on 158lbs LBM)
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Update June 24th: remeasured BF% @15.6 and LBM is now 159.6lbs - if i adjust my goals to maintain 7% BF my weight goal would be 171.6lbs
    Last edited by Romac; 06-30-2004 at 08:36 AM.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    The South
    Posts
    341
    Quote Originally Posted by Romac
    so they allow gay-ass forum clogging avatars but no sig?!

    GAY
    you'll stay around for a hella long time talkin like that bro. sigs are gone, no biggie

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    6'0"/248lbs
    Posts
    6,982
    Quote Originally Posted by Romac
    so they allow gay-ass forum clogging avatars but no sig?!

    GAY
    Avatars help seperate one member from the next... some of us are more right hemisphere than left - we need the visual cue And Avatars (for the most part) are not intrusive and require very little download time. But if you would like to complain enough about these "gay-ass forum clogging avatars" than perhaps you can be the one to revolt and get those removed too

    Signatures were removed primarily to protect the members at AR. Other than the fact that some posts would could get cluttered by a bunch of long sigs - the info passed in some of the signatures could be misleading... especially to newbies. Its now a reserved privelage for some... make your way to a VET here and you can have a sig...

    The descions made here are in everyone's best interest...

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by Warrior
    Avatars help seperate one member from the next... some of us are more right hemisphere than left - we need the visual cue And Avatars (for the most part) are not intrusive and require very little download time. But if you would like to complain enough about these "gay-ass forum clogging avatars" than perhaps you can be the one to revolt and get those removed too

    Signatures were removed primarily to protect the members at AR. Other than the fact that some posts would could get cluttered by a bunch of long sigs - the info passed in some of the signatures could be misleading... especially to newbies. Its now a reserved privelage for some... make your way to a VET here and you can have a sig...

    The descions made here are in everyone's best interest...
    Cool thanks for the explanation.
    VET = sig
    that's a great system and will probably get rid of most or all of the crap sigs

    see! all i asked for was an explanation and when i recieved one i understood and supported the mods' decision.

    i'm not 'trying to run the place'...i'm just asking a question is all

    btw what gives VET status? length of membership or amount of posts? of course i always like to hear 'length of membership' because that helps to unclog the board by not offering an incentive for people to be forum whores.

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    "What one man can do, another can do."
    5'10" 34 years old - Currently cutting:
    June 1st 2004 - 198lbs approx 20%BF :: June 15 - 190lbs 16.7%BF :: June 30th - 186lbs 14.6%BF
    Goal: 7% BF by Aug 1st 2004 (172lbs total body weight based on 160lbs LBM)
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Last edited by Romac; 07-01-2004 at 04:24 AM.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    582

    Cool

    Quote Originally Posted by Warrior
    Signatures were removed primarily to protect the members at AR. Other than the fact that some posts would could get cluttered by a bunch of long sigs - the info passed in some of the signatures could be misleading... especially to newbies. Its now a reserved privelage for some... make your way to a VET here and you can have a sig...

    The descions made here are in everyone's best interest...
    Let me first explain that this post is in no way, shape, form, or fashion a flame towards the MODs/ADMIN here and/or the decisions made here. I originally posted this thread when I'd noticed my sig of nearly 2 years missing.

    However, Romac made an interesting point. Most boards censor the length of sigs to ward off those who choose to post a whole novel, meaningless pics, or some long chat conversations as their personal signature.

    But on the same note, Warrior makes a valid point too. However, and as pointed out by Romac, what converts a status from Member to VET? Length of time on AR? The activity level and/or amount of posts/threads created on AR? Possession of knowledge of the topics discussed on the board? The total amount of experience possessed from other boards, in addition to AR? Or acquired status from other boards (i.e., VET, Trusted Member, MOD, ADMIN, etc.)? Lastly, who determines the status on the board? I ask this simply because I've noticed such status being given to "newbies" and/or low active or non-active members on a few other boards while more active members remain just that, Members.

    And it's true, the sigs are not THAT big a deal. But much like the AV, most sigs identifies the individual person from others. In the meantime & in between time, most of us who prefer to use sigs can, I guess, insert it manually into each posts.

    TheChosen1
    SuperMOD@Anabolic-Support
    MOD@BodybuildingCentral


    Last edited by TheChosen1; 06-30-2004 at 05:00 PM.

  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by TheChosen1
    Let me first explain that this post is in no way, shape, form, or fashion a flame towards the MODs/ADMIN here and/or the decisions made here. I originally posted this thread when I'd noticed my sig of nearly 2 years missing.

    However, Romac made an interesting point. Most boards censor the length of sigs to ward off those who choose to post a whole novel, meaningless pics, or some long chat conversations as their personal signature.

    But on the same note, Warrior makes a valid point too. However, and as pointed out by Romac, what converts a status from Member to VET? Length of time on AR? The activity level and/or amount of posts/threads created on AR? Possession of knowledge of the topics discussed on the board? The total amount of experience possessed from other boards, in addition to AR? Or acquired status from other boards (i.e., VET, Trusted Member, MOD, ADMIN, etc.)? Lastly, who determines the status on the board? I ask this simply because I've noticed such status being given to "newbies" and/or low active or non-active members on a few other boards while more active members remain just that, Members.

    And it's true, the sigs are not THAT big a deal. But much like the AV, most sigs identifies the individual person from others. In the meantime & in between time, most of us who prefer to use sigs can, I guess, insert it manually into each posts.

    TheChosen1
    SuperMOD@Anabolic-Support
    MOD@BodybuildingCentral

    I did some searching and it seems number of posts is what determines vet status. So start blazing a trail of super-useless posts. I hate to do that, but it's the system THEY have chosen. I will conform to it. I don't want to be accused of trying to run the place by suggesting anything different.

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    "What one man can do, another can do."
    5'10" 34 years old - Currently cutting:
    June 1st 2004 - 198lbs approx 20%BF :: June 15 - 190lbs 16.7%BF :: June 30th - 186lbs 14.6%BF
    Goal: 7% BF by Aug 1st 2004 (172lbs total body weight based on 160lbs LBM)
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    North Jersey
    Posts
    2,690
    i think because they were getting long and ridiculous, if a sig is what i think it is

  10. #10
    Quote Originally Posted by nickrizz
    i think because they were getting long and ridiculous, if a sig is what i think it is
    they should have just limited them - can't be too ****ed (OMG!! they bleeped out the word "da.mn"!!! you can have an avitar of an ass with a pussy hanging down but you can't say "da.mn"!!!???) hard to limit the lines and characters, and turn html off so you can't post pics - i've belonged to many boards that cap sigs at 3 lines and a limited number of characters

    i'd rather have all these dumb-ass avitars and animations removed and have short sigs back
    Last edited by Romac; 06-30-2004 at 06:06 AM.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    The South
    Posts
    341
    Quote Originally Posted by Romac
    they should have just limited them - can't be too ****ed (OMG!! they bleeped out the word "da.mn"!!! you can have an avitar of an ass with a pussy hanging down but you can't say "da.mn"!!!???) hard to limit the lines and characters, and turn html off so you can't post pics - i've belonged to many boards that cap sigs at 3 lines and a limited number of characters

    i'd rather have all these dumb-ass avitars and animations removed and have short sigs back
    dude you act you are running this piece. Chill out homeboy

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    North Jersey
    Posts
    2,690
    people were writing novels in there and posting pics was dum, after you reply 2xs to a post your pic gets annoying, you know?

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    North Jersey
    Posts
    2,690
    i dont think eliminating them is that big a deal, i come on here for the info

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •