
Originally Posted by
MuscleInk
In my mind this is often a touchy subject. We have clear rules which state that phishing for or providing sources is strictly prohibited. While confirming the legitimacy of a brand or UGL isn't specifically providing a source, it is confirming the legitimacy of a resource for illegal anabolics (well, illegal in countries where this applies of course).
I've personally felt it was a little odd to restrict source discussions (which I agree is an appropriate rule) and yet allow people to discuss the legitimacy of brands or UGLs. It seems to be dangerously close to endorsing a source. I'm not an attorney (I leave topics like this to my attorneys who financially rape me, lol) but its an interesting dilemma. Where is TheGodFather? That guy could surely offer intelligent input on the topic.
I understand guys looking for reliable sources and wanting to avoid scams, but the reality is, discussions of sources at any level would seem to be a litigious issue at best.
Just my .02