I was reading up on EQ on the AR homepage and it said that it will not give you great strengh or mass gains. I was just wondering becuse I know that a lot of board members run EQ???
I was reading up on EQ on the AR homepage and it said that it will not give you great strengh or mass gains. I was just wondering becuse I know that a lot of board members run EQ???
Just like Deca it makes for a really good base. But it really needs to be stacked with something else. Usually test of some kind
I think the differance between the mass you get from deca and eq is water.
JohnnyB
EQ will give you quality gains where Deca gives you more quantity.
EQ will give gains without the water bloat..i prefer it over deca anyday
Originally Posted by depdaddy
makes sense to me thanks fellas.
In actual strength and mass terms, I really think deca eq and primo are all bad choices.
Test and tren have been the very best for myself.
I have noticed increase RBC from EQ, thats it though. For that reason when endurance is of importance to me, I would include it.
Deca I would include for joint relief. Primo I wouldnt use unless I got free.
My strength gradually increased while on eq but nothing dramatic.
If your expecting to increase your bench by 25lbs you will be dissappointed.
Far better choices exist for strength and size. However, let me add eq can be a good addition for a bulking cycle since it helps you eat everything in site.
~US~
If you expect to see good results from eq then you should run it in high doses for a long period of time. It is the onlt steroid that I have ever taken besides the test that I took with it and I liked it because It made me alot more vascular, keep some of the water weight off of me from the test, and also helped put a decent amount of lean muscle on me.
and I think I remember reading somewhere that it is more anabolic and androgenic than deca.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)