I have being reading the many threads lately on how people have being a liitle disapointed with LR3 IGF1 and how many feel that growth hormone long term would be a better investment for muscle growth.

My question is the most common recommended method of cycling LR3 IGF1 is 4 weeks on /4 weeks off, but why is this recommended i have never seen any studies that show that igf1 receptors downregulate after 4 weeks of LR3 IGF1.

Would a longer cycle of igf1, say 6 months be a more effective way of cycling LR3 IGF1, i know at the dose many use 60-100mcg a day it would be a lot more expensive than GH, buy maybe this dose is only needed because of the short duration of IGF1 cycles, maybe running a low dose like 20mcg a day for prolonged periods would bring better gains.

DISCUSS.