Quote Originally Posted by Mr.BB View Post
No not semantics, not even in norwegian. Androgenic is different from anabolic.

Which report shows less gains while on proscar?

I take proscar for years, have literally tested it myself cycling with and without and can tell you are wrong. But will wait for this bro-science reports...
Weakened CNS by less DHT?? Sorry but its really wrong IMO. Less IGF-1? Is it from less GH or from liver requiring DHT to function? Poor women, as they have very little DHT their IGF-1 must be also minuscule hehehe.

Only thing DHT (read proviron here) is useful in for thighter skin. If you want the shreded look priviron will help removing water from under skin. In muscle building DHT has no effect, you cant even find any inside muscles.
Have you actually felt BETTER on proscar or just noticed no difference? Since a while I've been thinking too much endogenous DHT can hinder muscle anabolism. DHT is purely androgenic, but since has higher affinity for the AR than T, perhaps it can antagonize the anabolic effect of the latter, to some extent?