Quote Originally Posted by Mutant
In Anabolics 2005 I was checking out the test results for the companies to see how well some of the products I have are manufactured, and I noticed that British Dragon got really bad results on just about all of their products. I remember reading somthing about Anabolics 2005 possibly being biased against British Dragon Here are some of the results:

Boldanon claim 200, results 132
Oxanabol claim 10, results 7.25
Primobol claim 100, results 154

These are just 3 of them, they are not all bad, but most are. Any thoughts on this, or the biasted idea?
I have no bias against BD. I like the company, and speak with them directly, in fact. The Primo, Boldenone, and Mastabol tests in A2005/BOS came right from a BD approved seller. They are a good company, but there are problems with raw materials from China from time to time, and BD is noticing the issues like many other manufacturers. They are not the only maker in the book to have problems with an EQ product.

In fact, BD has told me themselves that they will be reformulating their boldenone as an acetate (acetate, like most other esters is a solid at room temp, and easier to purity). They are doing this because of the inconsistencies with bold Undecylenate. A quality company just wouldn't care.