Oh, well, then... Some folks no doubt react differently, but in general it is felt that ED shots reduce sides as compared to EOD or more infrequent shots of tren A. You could try it, of course, but I see little reason to try E3D when you know that ED shots work nice. ED shots of course will give you better hormone level stability... that much is a no-brainer. Personal reaction to the spikes and dips can vary.

Never used bromo, here. I do use cabergoline. I got to, now... I have recurring prog gyno and I am not currently able to get it cut out.

As for running tren by itself, I know it is much better to run it with test, but I can think of one possible benefit of limited importance from using tren without test: progestin gyno is probably less of a problem with normal estrogen levels as opposed to raised levels due to aromatization of test. Of course letro takes care of that problem, but it is an interesting thought.

There are a lot of true-isms and factoids that we take for granted in the absence of contradicting studies. The conventional wisdom is something good to go by, generally, until it is disproven. It is correct more often than it is wrong, I think. We just need to keep an open mind and consider alternative theories in light of research, formal or informal.

Apparently it is difficult to get a large group of juicing bodybuilders together for a research project, get them clean, and get them started on experimental programs at the same time. So research into effectiveness of various treatments and the physique and health improvements from them, relative to juice apes, is quite limited. That is a pretty good explanation, I think, for why many of us trust the conventional wisdom so much. There is often nothing else to go by. We can infer or extrapolate from more limited studies (for instance, the hormone level studies that show great improvements in hormone level stability in EOD sust shots vs 2x/week shots) even though we don't necessarily have accurate controlled studies that measure actual muscle gains in bodybuilders. Researchers generally use just Joe Bloe college guy, or maybe they recruit young athletes, but seldom manage to get a decent pool of actual bodybuilders for subjects. We use a bit of logic and common sense and sometimes intuition and often our personal experience or anecdotal evidence to make connections and decide what to do.

The nice thing is even if you don't do everything perfect, whether you know or don't know the perfect way to do something, you still usually get decent results if you are going with the general run of opinion. Beats rolling the dice, I would say.


--
NO PMs for SOURCES!
NO PMs for questions that should be asked on the board!
NO "Thank You" PMs, please.
PMs are for personal or sensitive questions or information, or for stuff that is not allowed to be posted on the board.
Inappropriate PMs will not be read or acknowledged. Repeated reporters will be offended.
-The Baron-