Perpetual cycling... Mr.Sparkle?

[*Narkissos*]

A 6-8 week cycle can be just as suppressive as a 10-12 week cycle, why....

That's debatable. The longer you're shut down...the longer the road to recovery is. The possibility of NOT recovering increases the longer one is shut down.

Using tren is the best idea either, when trying to avoid or minimize shut down, 19-nors, shut you down harder then other gear.

I think you missed this...this was my explanation for including tren in the outline. It was a hypothesis.

A friend of mine pointed out that in the cycle i instructed tren-A to be used..cus it's a short ester. The contradiction here would be that even as a short-estered compound, tren is highly suppressive.

My arguement to this point is that...the average user uses tren longer than 6 weeks... so the duration of use may me more of a factor in determining the suppressivity of trenbolone...than the compound or metabolites itself.

1 question, why no HCG?

JohnnyB

Hcg's 'good' but avoided for a couple reasons:

¤ Trying to avoid elevating estrogen...as that would be further suppressive to the HPTA...and recovery. In addition...the potential backlash with an increase in estrogen is an elevation in SHBG...that's a double negative.

¤ Besides...the duration of the cycle is to short to make hcg applicable.

Meh...i'm tired. Forgive me if i babble....haven't slept more than two hours in the last two nights.

~Nark