Short heavy cyles explained- PB theory

[stupidhippo]

My question is.. as it is argued here that these short cycles are better for your lipid profile I would like some clarification.. It is argued that in 4 weeks (or whatever) the profile doesnt go as bad.. what Im thinking is then does the time off give enough time for the lipid profile to normalize and most importantly has anyone taken frequent bloodworks during this kind of cycling. I personally doubt it is enough that ur values have normalized if they then get messed up pretty soon after.. that would mean they would not be normal for most of the time. Many ppl here seem to think that if they are on for a long time and then they get off and have bloodwork done, and it comes back ok, then they are set to go another cycle..

[marcus300]

My question is.. as it is argued here that these short cycles are better for your lipid profile I would like some clarification.. It is argued that in 4 weeks (or whatever) the profile doesnt go as bad.. what Im thinking is then does the time off give enough time for the lipid profile to normalize and most importantly has anyone taken frequent bloodworks during this kind of cycling. I personally doubt it is enough that ur values have normalized if they then get messed up pretty soon after.. that would mean they would not be normal for most of the time. Many ppl here seem to think that if they are on for a long time and then they get off and have bloodwork done, and it comes back ok, then they are set to go another cycle..

This type of short cycle theory is better on your system, alot of my studies have had their blood work done and they all said that they recovered quicker than the cycles they were doing beforehand, the damage accours when you stay on gear to long, your body gets use to the hormones and shuts itself down and recovery is very hard work, maybe not when your younger as much but as you get older and try to come off the recovery is really hard and usually HRT comes sooner than expected or you end up going back on, then you have to increase the dose to try and get new muscle growth.i personaly stay on pct until ive fully recovered, no matter what time scale it is.

If your prime the body correctly and get the gear in and out in a short period then its far better on your system, and before your body can respond with side effects your off and recovering, i understand people will recover at different rates but in most they recover alot quicker and better, am not saying go straight back on a cycle when your blood work is correct, i would rather prime my body over a long time then repeat a cycle but normaly the one that follows the heavy short cycle is a mild one, i do know BB's who go straight back on after a heavy cycle when there blood work is fine but these BB's are competeing at a high class and its their disission.

All i can say is if your advance enough and have plenty of expeirence in gear and training give one a go and see if they are for you, most people are very stunned with the results of how much new muscle tissue can be obtained if the correct tools are applied.

Regards marcus

[vitor]

This type of short cycle theory is better on your system, alot of my studies have had their blood work done and they all said that they recovered quicker than the cycles they were doing beforehand, the damage accours when you stay on gear to long, your body gets use to the hormones and shuts itself down and recovery is very hard work, maybe not when your younger as much but as you get older and try to come off the recovery is really hard and usually HRT comes sooner than expected or you end up going back on, then you have to increase the dose to try and get new muscle growth.i personaly stay on pct until ive fully recovered, no matter what time scale it is.

If your prime the body correctly and get the gear in and out in a short period then its far better on your system, and before your body can respond with side effects your off and recovering, i understand people will recover at different rates but in most they recover alot quicker and better, am not saying go straight back on a cycle when your blood work is correct, i would rather prime my body over a long time then repeat a cycle but normaly the one that follows the heavy short cycle is a mild one, i do know BB's who go straight back on after a heavy cycle when there blood work is fine but these BB's are competeing at a high class and its their disission.

All i can say is if your advance enough and have plenty of expeirence in gear and training give one a go and see if they are for you, most people are very stunned with the results of how much new muscle tissue can be obtained if the correct tools are applied.

Regards marcus

Greate post!

What do you think of the 2on 4off theory. Yust read a case study with "Bill Roberts", (hes client seemed to have make more progress with only 4 weeks on,than he ever could achieved "natrually".)

I guess the benefit here would be that you recover HPTA very quikly.....

[marcus300]

Greate post!

What do you think of the 2on 4off theory. Yust read a case study with "Bill Roberts", (hes client seemed to have make more progress with only 4 weeks on,than he ever could achieved "natrually".)

I guess the benefit here would be that you recover HPTA very quikly.....

Ive seen the same thing recentley, looks intresting and will be trying it out, i do have BB's who run 20 days cycles with great resuts,
correct the benefit is recovery with same results as a long cycle.

cheers for your commets
marcus