whats the best anabolic fat burner?

[magic32]

don't make me bust out my einstein/hawkings up in hea! fact DOES depend on probabilities cause all facts have exclusions based on relativity. with facts you are assuming a truth under certain constants that are often taken for granted. it's just like nothing is impossible, just improbable. take a fact and apply it in different laws of physics and the fact is no longer applicable. it's all relative.

let my people grow,
AC

WHO IS THIS GUY? AND WHY IS HE HERE?

I don't about what you studied, but the crap in this quote is just that!

FACT: 1 + 1 = 2

• not dependent upon probability
• there are no exclusions
• no assumptions
• nothing taken for granted
• and the laws of physics are built on this principle

And nothing's impossible, just improbable... that's a Sherlock Holmes quote!
Here's an impossibility, "no matter how high you can jump you can't touch the stars." Make it improbable.

M.

[Pinnacle]

WHO IS THIS GUY? AND WHY IS HE HERE?

I don't about what you studied, but the crap in this quote is just that!

1 + 1 = 2
not dependent upon probability
there are no exclusions
no assumptions
nothing taken for granted
and the laws of physics are built on this principle

And nothing's impossible, just improbable... that's a Sherlock Holmes quote!
Here's an impossibility, "no matter how high you can jump you can't touch the stars." Make it improbable.

M.

Well the bag of wind stated in his profile he has only ran mild doses of anabolics and is a newbie.But above he states he ran everything under the sun.He also started another thread saying he hasn't been in the loop for years and switched professions ect.Like I said,he's nothing but a bag of hot air.


Puff...care for an internet pose down?Can you handle that?Or since you failed at being a BBer,you switched to street fighting?


~Pinnacle~

[Dodger Blue]

ascendant seems intelligent and did have quite a few good points, why are people trying to attack his credibility? Just because there are many unqualified personal trainers, why assumes he's one of them? Or for that matter is unqualified? Just wondering

[Pinnacle]

ascendant seems intelligent and did have quite a few good points, why are people trying to attack his credibility? Just because there are many unqualified personal trainers, why assumes he's one of them? Or for that matter is unqualified? Just wondering

Probably because he went out of his way to post all this bullshit,and then you read his profile and other posts he has made.They don't add up to much of anything


"anyway, as far as my "knowledge" of gear, supplements and training, i have 14 years of certified personal training under my belt, 8 of those years holding a masters certification, and have personally studied extensively into physiology, kinesiology, biochemistry, and other fields that would help my words hold their weight fairly well. i have also used myself as a personal guinea pig numerous times comparing the effectiveness of different things."


"Let my people grow" ??? is he the mosses of BBing?Nigga please.......

[Giantz11]

"Let my people grow" ??? is he the mosses of BBing?Nigga please.......

Funniest shit I'ev read all day. Thanks Pinn.


And hey kids don't play around with T3 it'll shut your thyroid down forever..........................

[BajanBastard]

"Let my people grow" ??? is he the mosses of BBing?Nigga please.......

LMAO!! Funny shit Pinn

[magic32]

ascendant seems intelligent and did have quite a few good points, why are people trying to attack his credibility? Just because there are many unqualified personal trainers, why assumes he's one of them? Or for that matter is unqualified? Just wondering

I wasn't attacking his credibility as trainer. All I read were the latter posts where I came across this ridiculously indecipherable hodgepodge pre-Copernican thinking that looks suspiciously like an amalgam of confused quotes.

Originally Posted by ascendant
don't make me bust out my einstein/hawkings up in hea! fact DOES depend on probabilities cause all facts have exclusions based on relativity. with facts you are assuming a truth under certain constants that are often taken for granted. it's just like nothing is impossible, just improbable. take a fact and apply it in different laws of physics and the fact is no longer applicable. it's all relative.

To which I wrote 1 + 1 = 2, which refuted his entire paragraph of multiple statements.

And that Holmes quote when taken ‘IN’ context is meant for deductive reasoning not physical sciences. Loosely defined, Physics could be considered the study of impossibilities…”Gravity makes it impossible for oceans to float into the sky”; “It was impossible for the bullet to hit her because of it’s trajectory”; “The capacity of the his engine and incline of the hill makes it impossible for him to get a speeding ticket there”, etc.

So again, I don’t know what he studied but those statements are ridiculous!

M.

[Puffader]

Your such a sweetheart.

Take a deep breath. I'm not trying to compete with you.

You win. Now lets support the sport and leave the attitudes at home on March 18th

Puff...care for an internet pose down?Can you handle that?Or since you failed at being a BBer,you switched to street fighting?

~Pinnacle~